Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby
The part that they are liberal is obvious so it basically came down to Slots Grobnick’s claim that they are not a media.
Did you really need me to break it down to you into such simple bitesize pieces?
Huh? So a fashion magazine is not media? (Again, this goes back to my question I posed for Slots which even in your comment admitted that it was).
You are using liberal in context as a political belief system rather than a simply direction based on the status quo, therefore Glamour is not "liberal". If you are trying to argue that their "liberalism" is obvious then you are using the latter broad term, which has nothing to do with politics itself.
As for them being media , they arent that either as you are using media contextually as a way to distribute information about political subjects. Glamour magazine in no way fits that description.
Did I really need to break it down for you into such simply bite-sized pieces ???
You are using liberal in context as a political belief system rather than a simply direction based on the status quo, therefore Glamour is not "liberal". If you are trying to argue that their "liberalism" is obvious then you are using the latter broad term, which has nothing to do with politics itself.
As for them being media , they arent that either as you are using media contextually as a way to distribute information about political subjects. Glamour magazine in no way fits that description.
Did I really need to break it down for you into such simply bite-sized pieces ???
look before you leap.
”Direction based on status quo?” What BS are you trying to pull?
Everyone is political now. Look at the late night shows. The movie and music industries. The sports world. Fashion is no exception.
Furthermore, if Glamour isn’t being political, then why are they naming her the woman of the year? For her hijab fashions? Are you serious?
And if you think that “media” only means “a way to distribute information about political subjects”, then you need to go look up the word in a dictionary.
The part that they are liberal is obvious so it basically came down to Slots Grobnick’s claim that they are not a media.
Did you really need me to break it down to you into such simple bitesize pieces?
Huh? So a fashion magazine is not media? (Again, this goes back to my question I posed for Slots which even in your comment admitted that it was).
Only an extremist would use the word "liberal" to describe Glamour
Well I guess if you're part of the American Taliban you would view a fashion magazine as political.
As I said, you probably consider TV Guide far left wing propaganda.
LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
