Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2017, 04:56 PM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,576,536 times
Reputation: 14393

Advertisements

Do you even have to shoot deer in NY and CT? They have a nasty habit of running onto highways and becoming dinner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:19 PM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,832,835 times
Reputation: 4922
If you are hunting and you cannot 100% positively identify the target you are shooting at you don't take the shot, period. No excuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,554,229 times
Reputation: 18814
Hopefully he gets jail time and loses his right to own guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:28 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
As a deer hunter I find this reprehesible. At a min. the idiot hunter should be charged with manslaughter
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Richmond
1,645 posts, read 1,213,943 times
Reputation: 1777
It was already answered in post #18, the hunter got buck fever, saw something moving in the bushes, and before identifying what they were shooting at; they took a shot. So instead of hitting the deer they wanted; they killed a innocent person.


The sad part is if this hunter was any kind of decent person; both the hunter and the man who lost his wife, will now have nightmares for years to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:36 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,815,515 times
Reputation: 25191
Yea, what a real idiot, he was hunting after hours, he did not identify the target, and from what little I read so far, it was more of a shot towards "something big moving" than an actual innocent mistake.

I support hunting 100%, but damn there are some idiots that do it, way too many from my experience when my parents had to deal with them coming often onto our property (where it was clearly marked no hunting, no trespassing, with a fence around it).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,274,757 times
Reputation: 14591
Everybody is rightly focusing on the shooter. My question is why are grounds on;y couple of hundred yards from residential neighborhoods are allowed to be hunted on? Where is state culpability in this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 08:04 PM
 
32,068 posts, read 15,058,461 times
Reputation: 13685
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Happens every year. People run over their own children with cars too.

Actually cars are dangerous to all people as soon as they are in motion. Guns are only dangerous when someone put his finger on the trigger.
The discussion is about guns not cars. I find it fascinating how some love to deflect lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 08:09 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
The discussion is about guns not cars. I find it fascinating how some love to deflect lol
No it isnt, its about an individual who used very poor judgement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2017, 08:35 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
Everybody is rightly focusing on the shooter. My question is why are grounds on;y couple of hundred yards from residential neighborhoods are allowed to be hunted on? Where is state culpability in this?
If that was the case that would be a valid question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top