Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was already answered in post #18, the hunter got buck fever, saw something moving in the bushes, and before identifying what they were shooting at; they took a shot. So instead of hitting the deer they wanted; they killed a innocent person.
The sad part is if this hunter was any kind of decent person; both the hunter and the man who lost his wife, will now have nightmares for years to come.
Yea, what a real idiot, he was hunting after hours, he did not identify the target, and from what little I read so far, it was more of a shot towards "something big moving" than an actual innocent mistake.
I support hunting 100%, but damn there are some idiots that do it, way too many from my experience when my parents had to deal with them coming often onto our property (where it was clearly marked no hunting, no trespassing, with a fence around it).
Everybody is rightly focusing on the shooter. My question is why are grounds on;y couple of hundred yards from residential neighborhoods are allowed to be hunted on? Where is state culpability in this?
Everybody is rightly focusing on the shooter. My question is why are grounds on;y couple of hundred yards from residential neighborhoods are allowed to be hunted on? Where is state culpability in this?
If that was the case that would be a valid question.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.