Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-19-2009, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,644 times
Reputation: 401

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Turn it around - .1 or .2 the other way sends the alarmists into orgasmic episodes of glee - the "theory" must be right! The temperature has risen a tenth of a degree! Disaster!

What you've got to understand is that the other times we've had a sustained rise in global temperature of 4 degrees it has killed every living thing above the microscopic level, and took 8-10,000 years to accomplish. We've had a 2.2 degree rise since 1880 and you want to argue about 1934 versus 1998 or whatever? How is that important?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2009, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
"Science degrees"...yeah.
How about some of the 650 that were at the IPCC meeting in Poland? More flat-earthers?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...d-6e2d71db52d9

Did you even bother to look at some of those 31,000 relevant, credentialed qualified scientists - or do you just dismiss them out of hand?

That is really all the alarmists have, isn't it? Try and discredit those that disagree with their PREDICTIONS and THEORY.

Too bad The Goreacle or one of his minions will never enter into a debate with one of these deniers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Old Forge, NY
585 posts, read 2,223,504 times
Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
How about some of the 650 that were at the IPCC meeting in Poland? More flat-earthers?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...d-6e2d71db52d9

Did you even bother to look at some of those 31,000 relevant, credentialed qualified scientists - or do you just dismiss them out of hand?

That is really all the alarmists have, isn't it? Try and discredit those that disagree with their PREDICTIONS and THEORY.

Too bad The Goreacle or one of his minions will never enter into a debate with one of these deniers.

I'd rather be a "Goreacle" than in the pocket of big oil like Inhofe.

Last edited by Rumblebelly; 01-19-2009 at 06:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps

Wow! Look what has happened in the last 30 years - even with an alleged increase in temperature.

Quote:
I'd rather be a "Goreacle" than a tool for big oil.
Whoops! Here's the other debate talking point. Right - I'm sure all those scientists are in the pocket of big oil and are just doing their evil, dirty work for them - willing to compromise their integrity, career, honor and credentials to help out big oil.

Do you actually hear what you're saying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Rural Northern California
1,020 posts, read 2,754,931 times
Reputation: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatchance2005 View Post
What you've got to understand is that the other times we've had a sustained rise in global temperature of 4 degrees it has killed every living thing above the microscopic level, and took 8-10,000 years to accomplish. We've had a 2.2 degree rise since 1880 and you want to argue about 1934 versus 1998 or whatever? How is that important?
Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Yeah, with a link as well.

Tell me; what is the optimum temperature of the earth - I've asked numerous times and no one can tell me.

Tell me; what effects ice shelfs, glaciers and ice sheets - temperature or precipitation?

Quote:
other times we've had a sustained rise in global temperature of 4 degrees it has killed every living thing above the microscopic level, and took 8-10,000 years to accomplish
4 degrees from what?

You do realize that the frozen wasteland just north of the US was once a veritable tropical forest, teeming and thriving with life? You must know that it was much, much hotter at that time than it is today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Old Forge, NY
585 posts, read 2,223,504 times
Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps

Wow! Look what has happened in the last 30 years - even with an alleged increase in temperature.


You misinterpreted the maps. You are supposed to look at the colored areas. Snow cover (white) is not shown on the 1979 map, which might make it seem like there is more sea ice in 2008. From the page:

Historic snow cover data not displayed on these images. Sea ice concentrations less than 30% are not displayed in these images. Snow cover data is displayed only for most recent dates.

Also, do everyone a favor and compare dates that are similar to each other. You had Nov 1979 and Dec 2008

Try Nov 79 and Nov 08:

Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps

If you actually pay attention to the ICE, it looks like there is a little less on the 2008 map.

The the source of the data for the maps made this statement, if you are interested:

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph...a.ice.area.pdf

Observed global sea ice area, defined here as a sum of N. Hemisphere and S.
Hemisphere sea ice areas, is near or slightly lower than those observed in late 1979, as noted in the Daily Tech article. However, observed N. Hemisphere sea ice area is almost one million sq. km below values seen in late 1979 and S. Hemisphere sea ice area is about 0.5 million sq. km above that seen in late 1979, partly offsetting the N. Hemisphere reduction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,644 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
How about some of the 650 that were at the IPCC meeting in Poland? More flat-earthers?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...d-6e2d71db52d9

Did you even bother to look at some of those 31,000 relevant, credentialed qualified scientists - or do you just dismiss them out of hand?

That is really all the alarmists have, isn't it? Try and discredit those that disagree with their PREDICTIONS and THEORY.

Too bad The Goreacle or one of his minions will never enter into a debate with one of these deniers.

Oh yes, the "Oregon Petition": the Wikipedia of scientists. Vote against global warming and you too can have a PhD behind your name on the internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,316,979 times
Reputation: 1176
People are getting wise to Gores nonsense, 59% don't believe humans are causing "Climate Change" aka "wealth redistribution".
44% Say Global Warming Due To Planetary Trends, Not People (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/44_say_global_warming_due_to_planetary_trends_not_ people - broken link)

Note to Gore and Obama from Abe:
Quote:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2009, 08:30 PM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,644 times
Reputation: 401
[quote=sanrene;7075362]Yeah, with a link as well.

Tell me; what is the optimum temperature of the earth - I've asked numerous times and no one can tell me.

Tell me; what effects ice shelfs, glaciers and ice sheets - temperature or precipitation?



4 degrees from what?

You do realize that the frozen wasteland just north of the US was once a veritable tropical forest, teeming and thriving with life? You must know that it was much, much hotter at that time than it is today?[/quote]


Lets see, don't know what you're asking for on the first.

On the second, I don't know that there is one. As far as humans, research shows we function best at about 40 degrees, essentially the temperature at which we evloved.

On the ice shelves, both.

From the temperature before the increase.

The frozen wasteland that's rapidly melting? No not "much, much hotter", slightly warmer. 1-2 degrees is plenty to melt is all, as we are in the process of demonstrating.

http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...ug/global.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top