Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2017, 06:45 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15337

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
He didn't preach against it. Matthew was a rich government tax collector. He was brought on as a disciple. Jesus attended a dinner party at his house.
He said it was easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it was for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. So yeah, he kinda did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2017, 06:47 PM
 
25,445 posts, read 9,809,749 times
Reputation: 15337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobster View Post
Everyone should be athiests. That way you can do whatever you want without consequences, especially if you're in a position of power.

Atheism is the real YOLO religion. Do whatever you like.
Spoken by someone who has no idea what they're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 06:49 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
It's really irrelevant which religion the founders favored or if they favored none. All are clearly treated the same in the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 07:22 PM
 
4,529 posts, read 5,138,902 times
Reputation: 4098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jobster View Post
Perhaps, but if those who are in power are atheists, why wouldn't they change the laws to enhance their quality of life, even if it comes at the cost of yours?

They would be weak and foolish not to. If they don't, a stronger atheist will replace them.

You are entitled to believe otherwise, but it is merely entitlement.


What laws could atheists change to make their lives better? Why do you believe that atheists are more likely to abuse power than those of faith? History tells us otherwise.

You also seem to equate atheism with some kind of silly misguided view of what I can only guess is some kind of Darwinian evolution. Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 07:25 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,815,064 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebnllnb View Post
What laws could atheists change to make their lives better? Why do you believe that atheists are more likely to abuse power than those of faith? History tells us otherwise.

You also seem to equate atheism with some kind of silly misguided view of what I can only guess is some kind of Darwinian evolution. Why?
The government should remain neutral in matters of religion. It shouldn't "promote atheism" but also shouldn't promote Christianity. That is what the Constitution says.

As for abusing power, that is something that happens when you have authoritarian states. It doesn't matter if they are religious or secular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 07:57 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,621,539 times
Reputation: 22232
I wonder what triggered the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 08:31 PM
 
Location: The Land Mass Between NOLA and Mobile, AL
1,796 posts, read 1,662,111 times
Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
I wonder what triggered the OP.
I have no idea about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 09:02 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,222,200 times
Reputation: 35014
I'm an atheist so Christianity never meant anything to me and I used to debate it on a religious forum before I found CD. That said, I now appreciate the idea that we are a "christian nation" in light of an alternative being an "islamic nation" because I had never considered the possibility of a religious war before. So yes, I may not be religious but that's because I have the choice not to be Christian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 09:29 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,459,324 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
Christian nationalists can cherry-pick quotes from the Founding Fathers to promote their agenda of turning our government into a theocracy and likewise those who want a secular state have plenty of material to pull from. I personally believe that it's impossible to say "the founding fathers believed this" because there was a greater diversity in belief on religion's role in government in the late 18th century than people on both sides of the argument today want to admit.

However, what does matter is what our founding documents actually say. In 1776 there was no reason to be politically correct so if the founders wanted a Christian society, they could have easily put it in our Constitution. However, here is what we have.

Declaration of Independence: Reference to "nature's God" and a generic "Creator" but no reference to Christianity, Jesus, the Bible, the Church, or anything related specifically to Christianity.

Constitution: It bans religious tests to hold public office. It also guarantees freedom of religion and prevents laws pertaining to establishment of religion. Once again, no mention of Christianity, Jesus, the Bible, etc, etc. The Constitution doesn't even use the word "God."

Articles of Confederation: Also doesn't mention God, the Bible, Jesus, Christianity, etc, etc. It makes one reference to religion, in article III where it says "The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever."

This is not to say that the culture of our country hasn't been heavily influenced by Christianity because it has. However, our nation's laws are not bound to Christianity or its rules and if that is what the founders intended, it would say so in our founding documents.
Good points.

The founding fathers were for the most part pretty well classically educated, and children of the Enlightenment Era. Some were basically Deists (so these did believe in a Supreme Power but not necessarily a Trinitarian Christian one), and sectarianism dismayed them.

The Founding Fathers knew very well how religious fanaticism had torn nations elsewhere apart, and with a population so mixed and diverse in religious backgrounds they knew that religious wars could tear our fledgling nation to shreds. They took a sensible approach then, and it is still sensible for us today.

Those who claim that this nation was founded to be a specifically Christian nation are engaging in historical revisionism for their own purposes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2017, 11:53 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Gilead
12,716 posts, read 7,815,064 times
Reputation: 11338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post

Those who claim that this nation was founded to be a specifically Christian nation are engaging in historical revisionism for their own purposes.
I agree. I really wonder what the end-game is for these far-right evangelicals. Mass arrests of everyone that doesn't pass their litmus test? Death camps? They want to roll social progress back to before the Civil Rights act of 1964 and school prayer decision in 1963 as well as force people to adhere to Christian traditions and values. They want to shove non-Christian religions into the shadows if not ban them completely. They would probably also go after liberal Christianity i.e. denominations that accept LGBT members. However, the cat is already out of the bag and there is no way they will be able to force it back in with the Constitution as we know it today in place and without extreme coercion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top