Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Question for conservatives. Would you be ok if Chelsea Clinton would be appointed a function in Clinton's WH? And her hubby without any international politics experience relevant, would be given multiple important functions representing US interests in the world?
Think about it honestly for a second. Just consider your reaction and hate.
Truth is Hillary would have never done it, or even considered it. Trump is making US look like a joke by putting those people in place. The damage to the image of the U.S. is significant, from Europe to Asia.
Well, I would have a problem with her parents in the Whitehouse, so of course she would be on my **** list, too.
We totally understand the hatred for Ivanka. We get it. It is natural for all the hatred built up after having **** thrown in your face, after being promised the moon.
Honestly, she has never come across as very intelligent and continues on that path. An education doesn't make one intelligent, just educated or not depending on whether they earned the degree or bought it. I think the Clintons are finished, the whole bunch of them. Being brought up by parents that were much less than positive role models, I can't imagine her morals are much better than those of her parents.
Question for conservatives. Would you be ok if Chelsea Clinton would be appointed a function in Clinton's WH? And her hubby without any international politics experience relevant, would be given multiple important functions representing US interests in the world?
If her policies are like her mom and dads then no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immerse
Think about it honestly for a second. Just consider your reaction and hate.
You obviously didn't think about it so why ask others? Your hate and knee jerk reaction get in the way? Don't know why you're equating conservatives with trump since he isn't conservative. I get it, someone told you it was true and you fell for it. That's on you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Immerse
Truth is Hillary would have never done it, or even considered it. Trump is making US look like a joke by putting those people in place. The damage to the image of the U.S. is significant, from Europe to Asia.
Since progressive policies are known failures the thing to do is make things up about conservatives while deflecting from policies.
You're not concerned about image. How could you when you backed the war mongering, lying, bigoted democratic leadership. Benghazi taught us that.
Chelsea is really irrelevant, as are the Clintons. I wouldn't want any of them near the White House. The Trump kids are MUCH more accomplished. Chelsea even failed at the NBC job her parents bought her. You know Hillary, and Webster Hubbell.
I don't have a problem with Presidents having their kids and their kids' spouses working in the WH if those people are working in some capacity for which they are QUALIFIED.
My only issue with Ivanka is that she's not qualified.
Neither is Jared.
If they were, I'd be glad they were there, because Trump surely isn't qualified and he needs all the help he can get.
I'm just curious, what exactly do Ivanka and Jared need to be proficient in to be "qualified" for their jobs in the White House in your opinion? Both hold the title of "advisor" to the president. Exactly what do you think is required to be an "advisor"? I'm just curious because their job is in the title. They give their dad advice. He can take it, or not. You would qualify for this job Red. And so would I. These kids aren't cabinet members, they are unpaid helpers who are basically there to lend dad support and give him their opinion on things. And that's the beauty of the job, we all have opinions, so we all qualify to be advisors in the capacity that the president's children are advisors. Also, the reason they have official WH jobs was so they could be held under the same ethics laws as any other person employed by the government. In other words, they could have both just "hung out" with dad every day as his kids, without taking titles or submitting themselves to the ethics laws they are now held under. They chose to make it official. So again, I ask, what do you think they need to be proficient at in order to be the president's "advisors"?
No--who would want a well-educated, intelligent, knowledgeable first daughter when we can have a clothes horse who runs sweat shops, has no experience other than jobs funded or bestowed by daddy, who hasn't a clue how average Americans live and has had enough excellent plastic surgery to make her perfect?
No--who would want a well-educated, intelligent, knowledgeable first daughter when we can have a clothes horse who runs sweat shops, has no experience other than jobs funded or bestowed by daddy, who hasn't a clue how average Americans live and has had enough excellent plastic surgery to make her perfect?
Ivanka went to Wharton just like her dad. Perhaps the best business school in the country. Also, she runs her own companies, as well. What does Chelsea run?
Trump isn't making "us" look like a joke ...but the Democrats are a joke.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
