Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One of the greatest legal minds living, Allan Dershowitz, who is also a hardcore Democrat has said that Flynn has no credibility because of his guilty plea for lying. He is not a credible witness. Dershowitz has also states that from what he has seen and heard Trump has done nothing wrong. None of his actions are criminal or impeachable.
Dershowitz seems to have some sort of relationship with Trump, even if a casual one. And Dershowitz knows that prosecutors get defendants to plea to lesser crimes all the time so they will flip and provide testimony on other targets higher up in the investigation they are seeking information on.
Dershowitz also knows that when a defendant owns up to a crime they can still be credible to a judge and jury.
Dershowitz also forgets mention that Congress can define whatever they want as an impeachable offense and there doesn't even need to be a crime committed.
If Dershowitz is so sure about this case, how come he isn't on Trump's defense team?
Fellow Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina, said to tread lightly.
"There's an ongoing criminal investigation," Graham told CBS's "Face the Nation." "You tweet and comment regarding ongoing criminal investigations at your own peril. I'd be careful if I were you, Mr. President."
One of the greatest legal minds living, Allan Dershowitz, who is also a hardcore Democrat has said that Flynn has no credibility because of his guilty plea for lying. He is not a credible witness. Dershowitz has also states that from what he has seen and heard Trump has done nothing wrong. None of his actions are criminal or impeachable.
Be serious. Dershowitz is looking for an easy way to make some serious $$$s. And a LOT of them. Nothing else. He doesn't care if Trump is guilty or innocent. He just sees a way to make a pile. Hugely.
He might initially work for Trump, wouldn't doubt it a bit. Be aware though that HIS contract with Trump would be ABSOLUTELY UNBREAKABLE. Win or lose he gets his big time.
The rabid Trump supporters here should stop hyperventilating. If, as they believe, this entire investigation is a nothing burger and not producing any results, then nothing will come of it. If, on the other hand, Mueller’s investigation is uncovering crimes committed by members of the administration, then they should THANK Mueller for cleaning out the criminals in the WH on behalf of all Americans. You should see this as a win-win situation. Enough with the histrionics.
One of the greatest legal minds living, Allan Dershowitz, who is also a hardcore Democrat has said that Flynn has no credibility because of his guilty plea for lying. He is not a credible witness. Dershowitz has also states that from what he has seen and heard Trump has done nothing wrong. None of his actions are criminal or impeachable.
Dershowitz might be smart but he has also been a shill for OJ and he is being a shill for Trump
That is the mark of a great attorney--s/he can argue effectively even for those he hates---
All he had to do was tell Ari "No"--he took no money from the WH and he couldn't--
Two reasons--
He did and thus Trump is his client
An attorney can't roll over on his client
Section eight of the deal reached by Donald Trump’s former national security adviser in the inquiry into Russian meddling in the US election is entitled “cooperation”. It specifies that as well as answering questions and submitting to government-administered polygraph tests, Flynn’s cooperation “may include … participating in covert law enforcement activities”.
Long-time students of federal law enforcement practices agreed, speaking anonymously, that “covert law enforcement activities” likely refers to the possibility of wearing a concealed wire or recording telephone conversations with other potential suspects. It is not known whether Flynn has worn a wire at any time.
Just saw an interesting and ultimately sad profile of Mike Flynn on MSNBC--
Initial part about Flynn's early life and Army rise was very positive of his drive, skill and intelligence---multiple complements about his personal shaping of Army Intelligence in early days of Iraq/Afghan War
Then for variety of reason including Flynn's belief in the conspiracy side of Muslim terrorism--he just went overboard into obsession--and apparently a rabid hatred of HRC even though she was very supportive and appreciative of his work with JSOCs and Gen McKrystal...
I thought it was very fair in its praise for Flynn's ability to improve the Army's Intel resources
I find it ironic that apparently anyone dealing with Flynn kind of forgot that--
Covert law enforcement activities--
That was what Flynn taught the Army to sniff out in Iraq and Afghanistan for a decade
That show also included a time line --
Sally Yates KNEW about Flynn lying to the FBI--
She may not have revealed that in her Congressional testimony but knowing when the FBI initially went to Flynn--right after the inaugaration after a series of 5 phone calls Flynn had with Kislyak--he lied then and he might have tried to lie to Mueller after his investigation started...
So I imagine that Sally Yates told Don McGann when she went to the WH
And Don McGann revealed that to Trump--
That is one way Trump KNEW that Flynn had lied to the FBI and committed a felony before he fired him for lying to Pence...
That and the fact that Flynn told Trump what he discussed with Kislyak and with the FBI--
So Trump knew first hand that Flynn lied about the conversations about sanctions...
And Dowd did not send that tweet Trump sent re firing Flynn--
Twitter can validate the phone that sent the tweet by checking the IP address
Supoena the record...
Fellow Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina, said to tread lightly.
"There's an ongoing criminal investigation," Graham told CBS's "Face the Nation." "You tweet and comment regarding ongoing criminal investigations at your own peril. I'd be careful if I were you, Mr. President."
Dershowitz seems to have some sort of relationship with Trump, even if a casual one. And Dershowitz knows that prosecutors get defendants to plea to lesser crimes all the time so they will flip and provide testimony on other targets higher up in the investigation they are seeking information on.
Dershowitz also knows that when a defendant owns up to a crime they can still be credible to a judge and jury.
Dershowitz also forgets mention that Congress can define whatever they want as an impeachable offense and there doesn't even need to be a crime committed.
If Dershowitz is so sure about this case, how come he isn't on Trump's defense team?
Trump and Dershowitz got cozy at MarALago previously
Google knows....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
