Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If YOU believe Trump is a better President than Hillary Clinton would be, you have drunk every bit of the Koolaid Trump has poured out for you.
people can hate Hillary , love Hillary or not give a damn. But she is excellent on detailed policy. and she is middle of the road too, rather right leaning for a liberal.
I maintain this nation needs about 6 terms in a row of Hillary along with a bipartisan congress who would keep her in check. she knows more about leading a nation than the last 5 put together and yep that includes bill. She is just an awful communicator and was slandered by the right for decades because if she was in power they would not be able to strip mine the middle class until all that is left is wage slaves and billionaires...
people can hate Hillary , love Hillary or not give a damn. But she is excellent on detailed policy. and she is middle of the road too, rather right leaning for a liberal.
I maintain this nation needs about 6 terms in a row of Hillary along with a bipartisan congress who would keep her in check. she knows more about leading a nation than the last 5 put together and yep that includes bill. She is just an awful communicator and was slandered by the right for decades because if she was in power they would not be able to strip mine the middle class until all that is left is wage slaves and billionaires...
Libya ring any bells? Yep, she's just greeeeaaate...
Libya ring any bells? Yep, she's just greeeeaaate...
i don't expect you to agree with me, i merely stating what should be obvious. we need policy wonks not rhetoric.
but i realize i am derailing so i will stop...
Your second sentence says it all. If you believe that HRC was that much better then there's more issues with you than I could ever address. Secondly, if in fact she was better she would've won but she did not...
I think the reason Trump won is still under investigation
And I note that your comment about my vote for HRC dissolves into a personal attack i.e. "There's more issues with you than I could ever address"
Ad hominem attacks are inheritantly insufficient because they attack the person not the logic the person espouses...
Ergo, you lose...
You always lose if you can't respond to the evidence vs the person...
Off topic and begs the question--how/why did Trump win...
That is the subject of Mueller's investigation which the GOP and the Trump syncophants are desperate to stop
Your second sentence says it all. If you believe that HRC was that much better then there's more issues with you than I could ever address. Secondly, if in fact she was better she would've won but she did not...
Unless Russia hacked the voting machines. That is one of the issues under investigation by Mueller.
The republicans have been investigating her for 30 years and come up dry. What makes you think another investigation would be successful?
Because he'll purge the "sick and rigged system" and replace every 'investigator' with a loyalist...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
