Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2017, 03:06 PM
 
222 posts, read 185,741 times
Reputation: 167

Advertisements

Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2017, 03:49 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,775,066 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post
Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.
I guess you missed the Virginia election that happened last month. Lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 03:51 PM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,566 posts, read 10,622,240 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post
Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.
It isn't just the dems. It is both parties that need to find a message. Party over country for all of them. They will promise you the moon to get their seat and they have a cushy life from there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,850,938 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post
Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.

You think so, huh ? I can guarantee you that if we had an election right now, Trump would not win. We were caught sleeping at the switch on the last election, no one in the world thought that anyone would actually vote for a man with the lack of credentials, intelligence, and ethics as Donald Trump. Boy, did we misread the mindset of voters in this country. THAT WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN.

Trump has been his own worst enemy in that regard. If he had come in, acted half way sane, controlled his immature impulses, and actually did work, instead of just trying to obliterate Obama's legacy, he might have a shot at it. But he is the gift that keeps on giving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,269,029 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post
Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.
Well thanks for the honesty over the BS title. That's something.

But first, the Democrats "moved" nobody. People migrate where the jobs are and most of the jobs are in urban areas.

So the rural areas were left to those who wish to hang onto the idea that low-skilled high wage jobs are magically returning.

Your assertion that Dems have won because they are 'popular' is really a very pat and simplistic statement for a very complex subject. And it is not true.

Bush Sr. presided over a recession and was out of touch. Clinton offered up fresh new ideas and brought a great economy without starting new wars. George Bush was not popular and neither was Al Gore. Toss up. Obama offered hope after Bush caved to the wealthy and started two new wars--one totally unnecessary. And the Bush policies crashe d the economy.

Trump was not and is not popular. Hillary was also not popular. So angry rural voters turned out in force thinking Trump is going to bring their jobs and the 50s back. It has yet to happen and probably will not. And Trump's popularity has totally tanked since the inauguration. He is a very unpopular president.

I don't think it is the Dems who have played themselves. I think it is Trump who has 'played' rural America (a place he visits for rallies, but will never ever spend a night or live).

https://www.wsj.com/articles/rural-a...ity-1495817008

Last edited by Enigma777; 12-03-2017 at 05:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 04:10 PM
 
3,402 posts, read 3,578,000 times
Reputation: 3740
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
You think so, huh ? I can guarantee you that if we had an election right now, Trump would not win. We were caught sleeping at the switch on the last election, no one in the world thought that anyone would actually vote for a man with the lack of credentials, intelligence, and ethics as Donald Trump. Boy, did we misread the mindset of voters in this country. THAT WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN.

Trump has been his own worst enemy in that regard. If he had come in, acted half way sane, controlled his immature impulses, and actually did work, instead of just trying to obliterate Obama's legacy, he might have a shot at it. But he is the gift that keeps on giving.
Happen again or not doesnt even matter now. America is screw pretty much for having Trump became the president. It would take decades to rebuild the country reputation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,654 posts, read 6,220,900 times
Reputation: 8254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post
Preface: I’m admitting that I used the thread title as an eye catcher however it ties in with the overall theme.

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again and the democrats wouldn’t have a clue as to why. They’ve been banking on a strategy for years based on who was more popular. The only elections they’ve won since fdr was not because majority of Americans agreed with their platform but because the dem candidate was extremely popular (jfk/Johnson by default, carter, clinton, Obama). Only Reagan comes close to any of those in popularity. Dems have fooled themselves and their supporters that you need a majority of the people in order to win the White House.

This has never been the case. Trump or someone backing him has keenly figured out that you don’t need to be popular all over the USA. You just need a core group of people strategically located (wherever) in order to reach that 270 number.

How did the democrats play themselves? Over the years, they have moved minorities and their base supporters into urban liberal cities (NYC, La, Chicago, etc) while the rest of the respective states have been left to be taken over by the rural (possibly White conservative) voters. This is evident by republican take over of like 99% of state houses over the years. So while the numbers favor democrats in that the country is browning. However where they’re located matters and as long as the numbers are only growing in urban centers it still leaves whole rest of states open for the “other” voters.

How can democrats fix this? Get rid of trying to find a message that fits EVERYONE. They need to find a message. And whoever likes it likes it. Whoever doesn’t, kick rocks. Exactly what the republicans did.
The Republicans did not want Trump to win the nomination. It seems a little disingenuous to suggest that the Republicans planned the outcome of the election. There are still a lot of establishment Republicans who deeply disagree with Trump. To see the election as a failure of vision on the part of Democrats is not wrong but it is a vast oversimplicafication.

Last edited by CrowGirl; 12-03-2017 at 05:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,850,938 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybklyn View Post
Happen again or not doesnt even matter now. America is screw pretty much for having Trump became the president. It would take decades to rebuild the country reputation.

You are absolutely correct. In one short year, Trump has done damage to this country, nationally and internationally, that will not be repaired overnight. He has put up so many walls (just not the one he promised) between us and each other, and us and our allies, that the next guy/gal is going to have their work cut out for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrowGirl View Post
The Republicansdid not want Trump to win the nominations.It seems a little disingenuous to suggest that the Republicans planned the outcome of the election. There are still a lot of establishment Republicans who deeply disagree with Trump. To see the election asa failure of vision on the part of Democrats isnot wrong but it is a vast oversimplicafication.
Nope, you are right, the Republicans were caught as flatfooted as we were. They no more wanted Donald Trump than the man in the moon, but he created such a groundswell of supporters that they were forced to take him as their standard bearer. Even today, they want him gone, but just need to figure out a way to do it and not shoot themselves in the foot doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 06:44 AM
 
222 posts, read 185,741 times
Reputation: 167
I guess most are missing the point that republicans have won the White House over the past 60 years with the exact same message = take our country back / make America great again (they’re the same message).

Dems have been winning based on the message of the most popular candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 06:53 AM
 
2,951 posts, read 2,520,332 times
Reputation: 5292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justw8 View Post

If the election were to be held again today trump would win again
With what has occurred since he's been in office? The tax stuff, the russian stuff, more lies, more tweeting?
No he would not win, he's had too many defectors. and is running at a 33% favaroable rating.

Just cause you are a tribesman, don't think you stand for all Trump voters back in November 2016.

Many have woken up to his special kind of insanity and would make another choice.

Last night on 60 MInutes they ran an interview of him in 2016, he said he'll be so busy, tweeting will greatly

reduce or stop. MORE LIES! So I guess he's saying now he's not busy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top