Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If Al Franken is being forced out of the Senate because of these allegations, why should Trump be shielded from consequences of the same type behavior? If Congress refuses to investigate and the Republicans elect Roy Moore then Franken should stay where he is, as the GOP has shown they don't really give a damn about this issue on any other level but political.
Lol....
Because Franken was elected to fall on his sword in order to make this seem more reasonable and justified.
Just like Conyers and the rest of the sexual harassment hoopla that's been going on for the past few months.
Democrats, apparently seeing what an utter and complete failure their accusing anyone who disagrees with them of being a deplorable racist was, are moving on to the "p***y grabber" strategy.
This is all to set up some Liberal with a vagina to run against Trump in 2020.
And if Liberals think this isn't as transparent as the way they overdrew the race card, then they may be in for a rude awakening.....
I thought the same thing when I heard the news! "F'ing Trump staged a false flag terrorist attack to divert attention away from this".
Hah, yeah... it seems like something erupts every time things heat up for him. I wondered if he had tweeted yet this morning, since he would usually be doing so.
I recall during the wonderful Clinton years, nothing but "it's his private business" when he was doing unspeakable things and acting in the worst possible way, but today all these outraged so called feminists want an investigation on 40 year old unproven allegations. You are all total hypocrites of the worst order.
And for all your bravery, 40+ years later accusing someone of something which cannot be defended is disgusting. The a$$holes who want to believe it will and they will rant and rave and rail and scream "impeach impeach impeach".
This is all getting old folks, the Democrats have not had a positive thought or idea in well over a year. No class, no grace, no brains, just big mouths.
Meanwhile the GOP happily continues to nominate, support and elect these guys, while trying to tell us they hold the high moral ground.
Nothing better than libs talking about a moral high ground. You folks sacrificed all credibility on morals to political expediency years ago. You reap what you sow baby...no one cares anymore. Especially when it's so blatantly political
I recall during the wonderful Clinton years, nothing but "it's his private business" when he was doing unspeakable things and acting in the worst possible way, but today all these outraged so called feminists want an investigation on 40 year old unproven allegations. You are all total hypocrites of the worst order.
And for all your bravery, 40+ years later accusing someone of something which cannot be defended is disgusting. The a$$holes who want to believe it will and they will rant and rave and rail and scream "impeach impeach impeach".
This is all getting old folks, the Democrats have not had a positive thought or idea in well over a year. No class, no grace, no brains, just big mouths.
What...that EIGHTEEN women who claim to have been sexually harassed or sexually assaulted have the courage to stand up for what is right?
Can you imagine if Obama had 18 women accusing him of sexual harrassment?! I wonder if Trump supporters would say "allow Obama due process" or "fake news." Friggin' hypocrites.
You could probably go downtown in any metropolitan area and find 18 women who would be willing to accuse Trump of sexual harassment.
I think it is useless and actually disingenuous to talk about what party did or didn't tolerate it's congressional members misdeeds in the past because, as we all know, the character of parties and congress changes. (I do think the Democrats of the past who ignored this issue were wrong, but that is the past.) So if we look at the standards NOW being used, it appears that the Democrats and Republicans are using different rule books. The Democrats are practicing no tolerance for sexual harassment and abuse. If you are credibly accused of it, you are gone. The Republicans think its not so bad. They tolerate it for political purposes. So we have an imbalance here. Time will tell which approach works for the voters. I do think that Republicans NOW should think about whether they want to keep company with other who think this sort of thing is not important enough to keep people out of congress or the presidency (ie: it doesn't really matter).
What is good for the goose is always good for the gander.
The GOP spent 5 years on the Clintons...to find a small stain.
Now we have a guy who admits to grabbing anything within range, who is a known cheater and adulterer and who has been seriously accused of raping even a 13 year old. Now - she dropped the lawsuit....but we don't know if she was threatened with death or bodily harm. Others have been.
A full and complete investigation is needed to prove if the POTUS is telling the truth - that being "it was only locker room talk".
A deeper question is this...if we find out that he DID rape underage and without consent and on and on, how many of his supporters would still stand behind him? I think a lot would...they are NOT the moral majority or anything like that!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.