Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Irreplaceable damage?
If he wont wear a condom and doesnt believe in abortions, he should get a vasectomy if he wants to stay in a relationship with her-
they are reversible.
Child birth, is not without risks of its own to the woman- something that is fairly often ignored by such as your self.
What is the risk of an abortion to a baby in the third trimester?
So, if a woman wanted to have her premie in the NICU terminated, since it’s not your body and that baby hasn’t reached the full term yet, you’d be ok with that?
That's not an abortion. If you want to talk infanticide, have at 'er.
In general, only my own medical decisions are my business. I don't decide when someone else should have heart surgery, and I don't decide when another woman has an abortion.
If the fetus can live outside the womb, no abortion. If you don't want the baby, put it up for adoption. There are lots of couples desperate to take it.
Fetuses and babies which are defective and likely to die anyway should be kept alive until body parts can be harvested to save viable babies.
That's not an abortion. If you want to talk infanticide, have at 'er.
In general, only my own medical decisions are my business. I don't decide when someone else should have heart surgery, and I don't decide when another woman has an abortion.
What is the difference between a premie delivered two weeks early and a baby in the womb that will be delivered in two weeks?
If the fetus can live outside the womb, no abortion. If you don't want the baby, put it up for adoption. There are lots of couples desperate to take it.
Fetuses and babies which are defective and likely to die anyway should be kept alive until body parts can be harvested to save viable babies.
You have three groups of people in this discussion:
1. Those who want to ban all abortions.
2. Those who want essentially no restrictions in the first trimester, some restrictions in the second trimester and heavy restrictions in the third trimester.
3. Those who want no restrictions at all.
This seems like a bit of a troll thread, but against my better judgment I will respond.
Yes, women ("females") should have control over their own bodies. They should not have the same decision making power over the bodies of another woman, or other persons for than matter.
Trouble is abortion is not their body but a live person they are choosing to kill. They should have the choice to keep their legs together or use birth control. They should not have the choice to kill their baby any more than the choice to kill a 12 year old. Anyone who does not know there is no difference between the two is an ignorant person who has no knowledge of life's reality.
Trouble is abortion is not their body but a live person they are choosing to kill.
At a point, yes. And even past that point, there are some very limited circumstances where it is justifiable. You can’t ask or demand a woman sacrifice her life. There can also be some extreme medical conditions for the baby where it’s arguably justifiable.
I think this is a tired topic that's been thrashed to death for many years.
And yet you showed up to comment.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
