Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, not making your point. The point was believing/willing to “only have sex for procreation”, and you claimed it was only "feminazis". I was merely pointing out that it’s contrary to what you said. Whether you consider people bangable is a separate topic. Also whether or not they would have an abortion. And what, pray tell, are “real men”?
I think you have me confused with another....I never made the only for procreation point...actually I never made any point except to poke holes in the argument that men have no say but are financially responsible.
So because it's a woman's body she has the only say...fine...but then she should have the only burdon as well.
It's up to her to have sex or not, use or not use BC, to choose a man who may or may not wnt her...It's all up to her...fine...it's up to her to support the kid then too.
You females want it both ways! You want equality but they cry when you're not treated special.
FWIW, my logic is based in LOGIC, not emotion which explains why 85% of you women think it's flawed...you don't get logic...only emotionally twisted opinions.
Nope. Wrong.
When men have sex, they know the possibility of pregnancy. If the woman keeps YOUR child, YOU are responsible for helping raise it.
Funny thing about that sentiment is those of you who are like that aren't the ones we want to have sex with anyway! We want the good looking feminine women, not the Rosie O feminazis.
Since it's ultimately the woman's body it's ultimately her responsibility to abstain, use BC or ensure the man does...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose
Cool, no sex for any man unless the woman is trying to get pregnant. That goes for the married guys too.
You heard it ladies. Abstain unless you want to get pregnant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC1984
Funny thing about that sentiment is those of you who are like that aren't the ones we want to have sex with anyway! We want the good looking feminine women, not the Rosie O feminazis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria
Uh, while I don’t agree with it personally, there are some members of my church who believe this (only for procreation). Church people. Lovely ladies. I bet other Christian women think the same. It’s not the provenance of just “feminazis”.
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC1984
I don't doubt what you say...although those lovely ladies are probably NOT the type that want to murder their unborn babies...They are more the type that real men are interested in...not the feminazis. You are actually helping me make my point, thank you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by latimeria
No, not making your point. The point was believing/willing to “only have sex for procreation”, and you claimed it was only "feminazis". I was merely pointing out that it’s contrary to what you said. Whether you consider people bangable is a separate topic. Also whether or not they would have an abortion. And what, pray tell, are “real men”?
Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC1984
I think you have me confused with another....I never made the only for procreation point...actually I never made any point except to poke holes in the argument that men have no say but are financially responsible.
Just so we are all clear on the flow of this particular strain of the conversation...
So because it's a woman's body she has the only say...fine...but then she should have the only burdon as well.
It's up to her to have sex or not, use or not use BC, to choose a man who may or may not wnt her...It's all up to her...fine...it's up to her to support the kid then too.
You females want it both ways! You want equality but they cry when you're not treated special.
FWIW, my logic is based in LOGIC, not emotion which explains why 85% of you women think it's flawed...you don't get logic...only emotionally twisted opinions.
I had zero emotions when I got an abortion. It was the logical thing to do.
Funny thing about that sentiment is those of you who are like that aren't the ones we want to have sex with anyway! We want the good looking feminine women, not the Rosie O feminazis.
Yes. As a woman who aborted a pregnancy affected by profound fetal defect twenty years ago, I am very much a supporter of choice. I may not agree with all of the reasons women cite for termination on a personal level, but I believe the option of termination must be preserved.
Nope, men do not have a legal right to prevent a woman from having an abortion, force her to have one or avoid paying child support so no matter how many times you parrot this it's still not true.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
