Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It’s not often that a court captures a debate perfectly in a sentence or two. After all, most debates are complex things that require layers of discussion.
However, the Delaware State Supreme Court just lowered the boom on restrictions that kept lawfully owned and carried firearms out of state parks. In the process, they summed up what we’ve been saying for years regarding firearms and gun control laws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delaware Supreme Court
The Superior Court earlier upheld the ban based on the “important governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in state parks and forests,” The Court did not believe the regulations violated any constitutional rights.
“But that conclusion is based on the questionable notion — unsupported by reference to any evidence – that outlawing possession of firearms in an area makes law-abiding citizens safer because criminals will, for some reason, obey the regulations,” the Supreme Court majority found.
“But that conclusion is based on the questionable notion — unsupported by reference to any evidence – that outlawing possession of firearms in an area makes law-abiding citizens safer because criminals will, for some reason, obey the regulations,” the Supreme Court majority found.
A state Supreme Court actually said that???
Maybe Hell is frozen after all.
I'd be VERY curious if the judges came up with that line themselves, or whether it was told to them by the lawyers arguing the gun owners' side.
Gun control only works if nobody has access to guns.
And since there are more functional guns than people in circulation, firearms technology peaked roughly half a century ago, gun tech itself is fairly low-tech by today's standards and accessible to the masses GUN CONTROL WILL NOT WORK.
It's an inescapable fact of life now... you might as well get angry and pass laws banning the fact that you have to breathe oxygen or die. "Pandora's Box" has been sitting open for a loooong time on this one.
Gun control only works if nobody has access to guns.
And since there are more functional guns than people in circulation, firearms technology peaked roughly half a century ago, gun tech itself is fairly low-tech by today's standards and accessible to the masses GUN CONTROL WILL NOT WORK.
It's an inescapable fact of life now... you might as well get angry and pass laws banning the fact that you have to breathe oxygen or die. "Pandora's Box" has been sitting open for a loooong time on this one.
Gun control only works if nobody has access to guns.
Which is exactly the Democrats' ultimate goal: Nobody is allowed to own guns any more.
Have you noticed that every time they praise countries whose "gun violence rates" have gone down, they always point to England, Japan, Australia, etc. - countries that have imposed almost total gun bans on their subjects.
Which is exactly the Democrats' ultimate goal: Nobody is allowed to own guns any more.
Have you noticed that every time they praise countries whose "gun violence rates" have gone down, they always point to England, Japan, Australia, etc. - countries that have imposed almost total gun bans on their subjects.
Take the hint.
Take the hint that those countries you've listed, all did so by public decision, making the usage of your descriptor "imposed" a fail.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.