Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-21-2017, 11:50 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,716,760 times
Reputation: 12943

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Funny, my 401k has done fantastic over the decades.

I don’t know a single person who has been hosed on their 401k.

I can only assume someone talked you into buying some crappy stock one day and you lost your ass.

Next time, use sound financial advise and not your cousin Lenny.
I'm not close to retirement but I did work with Enron and those people really did get hosed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
I would have had I not been forced into the government Ponzi scheme.
So contributing to Social Security caused poverty? Sure, okay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2017, 11:52 PM
 
32,065 posts, read 15,067,783 times
Reputation: 13688
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Apparently, you don’t understand how social security works.
Social security is taken out of every single paycheck. It is our money for our future. But the government has borrowed these funds to pay for other government spending. And now evidently, they can't pay it back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2017, 11:55 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,716,760 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Social security is taken out of every single paycheck. It is our money for our future. But the government has borrowed these funds to pay for other government spending. And now evidently, they can't pay it back.
And they just paid off their political donors to the tune of $1.5 Trillion so they have even less money to pay it back with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 03:58 AM
 
Location: Future Expat of California
665 posts, read 613,697 times
Reputation: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
In Galveston Texas, government workers were able to opt out of SS and go into a private system where they pay their own way and make their returns off of their money.

Not once have they petitioned to go into SS, because they are doing so much better off the privatized system, they don’t want to drastically cut their retirement funds.
Alot of government agencies opted out of SS in the 80's. So those govt employees who came after will have a better retirement package w/o SS. If those employees want to apply for SS with their pension benefits they would get knocked down on the SS scale because of their pension benefits.

Some government agencies don't have a pension (such the federal government and the City of San Diego recently as of a few years ago).

If the SS was to be improved, then I think it should include raise the cap on income it takes away and the tax on it should raises like taxes with the higher percentages at higher salaries. But current politicians and some previously don't want to improve SS.

Also people could better prepare for retirement on their own with taxable accounts, 401k's, IRAs, starting their own businesses, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 04:01 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Then both big government parties ( Dems and GOP ) would do it.
Its a political football use to score points. The game must continue till the ball is flat and the fans have emptied out of the stadium.
We have a winner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,270,262 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Beagle View Post
No it isn't. You don't have an account. They want you to think you do, but it's a pay as you go program. You are paying for the people drawing now and the hope is there will be poor suckers paying into it when it is your time to draw from it.
And there will be -- but the problem is that


1) They may be paying in at 75% of what they are now


and


2) Eventually there may be runaway inflation, and what is received from SS, will pay for far less than anyone is expecting.


The day is coming, we just don't know when.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 04:55 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,143,759 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
Social security is sustainable with some increase in both retirement ages
Usually said by someone who's spent their lives working in an air-conditioned office building while setting in a nice cushy office chair. Spend forty years working hard physical labor and then come back and talk to us. They starting raising it in 1983. A mere few years after some of us graduated high school. They just keep moving the goalposts farther and farther on some of us. I agree that something needs to be done, but raising the age at this point is ridiculous, especially for the younger generations. You need to consider the WHOLE workforce because from a physical standpoint 70 is too old to be doing demanding physical labor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 05:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,031 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Remove the cap on SS taxes. Problem solved.
Can't do that unless the cap on benefits is also removed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 05:08 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,627,203 times
Reputation: 1789
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
They should allow you to be part of a privatized system so you can get better returns and count on it being there.
How much better benefit do you think people would get? 3 to 5 times what social security pays?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2017, 05:09 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,733,181 times
Reputation: 3038
Lots of people think they can do better than social security on a risk adjusted basis. The fact they quote 401K results as "evidence" undercuts their veracity. None have ever priced annuities with survivor benefits, obviously.

2/3's have no 401K and those over 65 that have one have an average of $200K. Not encouraging at all!

Twice in the last 17 years people nearing retirement have seen their equity balances savaged at the most inopportune times! A lot of then lost their jobs at the same time. I've seen it first hand. They all thought they were wonderful investors. Until they weren't.

Now let's just suppose that for some reason they must stop working well before 65. Ooops!

Last edited by shaker281; 12-22-2017 at 05:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top