Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:36 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
There is no guarantee of prosperity in the Constitution or Bill of Rights.

You have the right to "pursue happiness"(prosperity) but you don't have the right to have someone else provide you with it.
That is what QE did. Why is it wrong to want to rectify that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,454 posts, read 7,086,044 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It does not matter if you agreed with it or not. The government did it.

Since you say you disagree with it, why is it wrong for people to want to rectify the damage it did?
How is taxing people disproportionately "rectifying" the damage?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:37 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,607,699 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
How is taxing people disproportionately "rectifying" the damage?
I’m guessing he feels anyone making north of $500k is receiving a check after each QE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,596,838 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
How much federal income taxes goes towards those things?
Interstate Highways are funded by federal dollars, except where they have been made toll roads. And quite a few states have progressive income tax as well, including Arizona here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:40 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,713 posts, read 18,788,778 times
Reputation: 22562
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
No, it is not communism

The commons is things like roads, police, fire protection, the courts, public defenders, prosecutor, etc.
You're coming back with a straw man here.

I don't care what the "common infrastructure" is. We are not discussing that. What we were talking about is the "common" means of funding whatever infrastructure we decide we should all fund. I'm claiming that what you propose to do is not "commons" at all. It's communism. A "commons" form of funding is that everyone in the system pays the same amount... thus the word "COMMON." Your version of "common" means of funding is called redistribution (communism). What you are proposing here is essentially an excerpt from Marx's Manifesto. But, go on and call it what you like. A pig wearing lipstick is still a pig.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:40 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
How is taxing people disproportionately "rectifying" the damage?
We gave the top an ungodly amount of money without working for any of it. Why shouldn't they pay some of that back?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
4,944 posts, read 2,939,880 times
Reputation: 3805
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
There seems to be quite a few on the left that want to punish millionaires or billionaires .

Bernie Sanders is one even though he is likely a millionaire himself .

Why is there this desire from the left to see millionaires and billionaires suffer somehow?

We know socialism and communism does not work yet there is this constant desire to turn America away from capitalism .

Also with inflation these days being a millionaire isn't what it was back in the 1960s or so .

There are about 10.8 million millionaires in America today which is a pretty significant amount . Why would the left want to turn off such a large part of the population ?

The opportunity to become a millionaire and financially independent without having to work for someone else forever is one of the great things about America and this isn't an opportunity available everywhere in the world . One reason so many immigrants want be in America and why so many have moved to America over the years .

Agree or disagree ?
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,596,838 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
You're coming back with a straw man here.

I don't care what the "common infrastructure" is. We are not discussing that. What we were talking about is the "common" means of funding whatever infrastructure we decide we should all fund. I'm claiming that what you propose to do is not "commons" at all. It's communism. A "commons" form of funding is that everyone in the system pays the same amount... thus the word "COMMON." Your version of "common" means of funding is called redistribution (communism). What you are saying here is essentially an excerpt from Marx's Manifesto. But, go on and call it what you like. A pig wearing lipstick is still a pig.
There is no point to public services if everyone is going to have to pay the same $ amount, because then the poor, working class and lower middle class wouldn't have the money to pay anyways. You are supporting regressive pricing like the private sector. The point of the public sector is equal access for everyone, regardless of means or ability to pay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,454 posts, read 7,086,044 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
No, it is not communism

The commons is things like roads, police, fire protection, the courts, public defenders, prosecutor, etc.
None of those things require taxing some people at a higher percentage of their income than others in order to exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2017, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,596,838 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
None of those things require taxing some people at a higher percentage of their income than others in order to exist.
Yes they do, because the lower classes don't have enough money to pay the same percentage as the upper classes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top