Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-05-2018, 09:49 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by raisins99 View Post
I’m not sure I understand this question. Lack of private rooms doesn’t mean the healthcare is poor. Not approving non essential procedures likewise doesn’t indicate poor care. These are both some reasons people under single payer might buy private insurance.
Private rooms are now approaching the standard of care because of privacy and infectious issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2018, 09:49 AM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,660,053 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
Medicare can provide quite extensive and beyond just 'basic' care. More than enough to 'get you by'. Medicare covers the vast majority of medical/surgical treatments. It may even be too lenient in this manner.
Yes, I'm aware of that as both my parents are on it and it has been phenomenal for them. I didn't mean to say the two systems were equal, but Medicare, like the NHS, has well-documented outlines for what they will offer as standard care. I believe both (Medicare and NHS) will provide full up coverage for any condition. But there is a reason that people with Medicare and NHS want to augment with private insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 09:52 AM
 
20,459 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by raisins99 View Post
How does it suck? They are able to mobilize efforts to address a serious crisis that hasn't been seen in 30 years. This year's flu epidemic is a very bad one.

Furthermore, a primary problem with today's NHS is budget cuts. If you don't fund it, it doesn't work appropriately. It's a bunch of idiots who think single payer is a failure or unneeded despite empirical evidence that shows the exact opposite.
right because a broken system that reports "running out of corridor space".... never mind even considering talking about ROOMS.... has nothing to do with the way a system is designed.


flu did it. not a system that lack the robust capacity to deal with some crisis or another.
good grief the lengths people will go to justify nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 09:56 AM
 
2,951 posts, read 2,518,975 times
Reputation: 5292
^^^^ correct!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
San Diego hospitals are setting up flu triage tents. 45 died so far.
Yikes!

Hubs and I avoided flu a couple weeks ago by having a stash of Tamliflu at home. Stuff works miracles.

A friend of mine in Canada said they held back treatment for a kidney issues with her husband. Her 'story'. But she neglects to say he was an 83 year old serious drunk. She might be in denial about it but the doctors weren't.
If they were in the US, I'm betting an insurance company would of denied treatment also.

Yeah I think treatment money should not be wasted on someone like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:02 AM
Status: "“If a thing loves, it is infinite.”" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Great Britain
27,176 posts, read 13,461,836 times
Reputation: 19472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
right because a broken system that reports "running out of corridor space".... never mind even considering talking about ROOMS.... has nothing to do with the way a system is designed.


flu did it. not a system that lack the robust capacity to deal with some crisis or another.
good grief the lengths people will go to justify nonsense.
The NHS in England treats over 1 million people every 36 hours, carries out over 10.2 million operations and procedures every year and there are over 16 million inpatients every year, so 50,000 operations is only a tiny proportion of non-urgent operations and it should be noted that hospitals stop taking non-urgent cases and visitors to cut down on the spread of norovirus and types of flu.

The following Statistics apply to England only, there are seperate figures for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

NHS statistics, facts and figures - NHS Confederation

Norovirus latest: Restrictions remain in place in the North East - ITV News

As for funding there was an NHS Funding increase in the budget, whilst Social Care has also seen a budget increase.

Whilst your own US Commonwealth Health Fund carried out reseearch last year in relation to different heath care systems with the UK NHS being ranked number 1 and the US being ranked last, among the findings were that in the US 44 per cent of people on low incomes were found to have difficulty accessing healthcare, compared to just seven per cent in the UK.

NHS judged best health service in new ranking with US coming last | The Independent (2017)

The Commonwealth Fund - Health Policy, Health Reform and Delivery

Budget 2017: Social care gets £2bn funding boost - Community Care
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,525 posts, read 34,851,331 times
Reputation: 73759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
right because a broken system that reports "running out of corridor space".... never mind even considering talking about ROOMS.... has nothing to do with the way a system is designed.


flu did it. not a system that lack the robust capacity to deal with some crisis or another.
good grief the lengths people will go to justify nonsense.

Very few medical centers ANYWHERE can accommodate hundreds of new patients above the regular amount.

Do you know how financially unsound that would be? Private, gov't... doesn't matter, no one runs a business to serve double the ordinary number of people on the off chance that once every 20 years there will an occasion.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:22 AM
 
3,357 posts, read 1,234,070 times
Reputation: 2302
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
And this is what some idiots in the US want for the US.

Single payer sucks balls.
I am all for single payer.
The issue here is that a huge spike in flu is taking up all the beds. I would totally understand if my local hospital experienced a huge flu epidemic.
Personally, I would rather postpone my elective surgery rather than being under the same roof as all those flu germs!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,275,241 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
The private health care system simply does not work when "consumers" are not informed. You cant shop around for the best value heart surgery when you're having a heart attack. Price gouging is rampant at all levels of the health care system, unnecessary treatments is also a common occurance. Just because they can earn more money that way.

If you honestly think a privatized system is so great, why has every other country rejected it?
It also doesn't work when the privately insured are kept in the dark about their coverage, and other sources of support.

June this year the Mrs. Received a bill for $250,000 "uninsured excess". For her treatment for anorectal cancer (which seems to have worked). This was on top of the $18,000 out of pocket we already paid. Fortunately we're financially separate, so she was eligible for funding, and had that $1/4 mill written off no harm no foul. However to find that out took me three weeks of pursuit of insurers, the hospital, various local, state, and private organizations. Then we got the filing in just before it was in arrears (which would have been grounds for refusal of the application). This was while my wife underwent chemo and radio therapy.

Now if I wasn't so savvy, and if I wasn't so determined, and if one of the people I discussed this with were less helpful, then the $250k would have been owed by my wife for her treatment, AFTER insurance, and probably if a judicial solution was sought I'd probably be on the hook and $250k is a decent chunk of change. I wouldn't mind, but in truth she was only in hospital for about 2 hours a week (across 5 days) or 12 total hours in 6 weeks (across this didn't include imaging or specialist fees).

So all in all, We paid around $25k for the treatment, and I paid $600pm excess on my policy for the insurance for years, they paid $18k for the treatment, and the hospital wrote off (was paid whatever) $250k. That's kind of a cosmic joke there.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The RulesInfractions & DeletionsWho's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,525 posts, read 34,851,331 times
Reputation: 73759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstarling View Post
I am all for single payer.
The issue here is that a huge spike in flu is taking up all the beds. I would totally understand if my local hospital experienced a huge flu epidemic.
Personally, I would rather postpone my elective surgery rather than being under the same roof as all those flu germs!

Exactly.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:26 AM
 
18,802 posts, read 8,471,648 times
Reputation: 4130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstarling View Post
I am all for single payer.
The issue here is that a huge spike in flu is taking up all the beds. I would totally understand if my local hospital experienced a huge flu epidemic.
Personally, I would rather postpone my elective surgery rather than being under the same roof as all those flu germs!
Exactly. If you are at high risk like my wife with her lymphoma, or you are due for elective surgery stay away from people and wear your own mask. Postpone your surgery if you can until this flu season dies down. Or if possible have it some at some outpatient center.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top