Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hmm.. the FISA court open up on the Trump campaign because of Papdopulus spilled the beans to a Australian diplomat and a insider in the Trump campaign told the FBI something fishy was going on.
That was before the Steele Dossier.. please try again.
Aswell as several foreign intelligence where screaming to the FBI/CIA that the Trump campaign where in constant contact with Russian officials, and where not taken to seriously.
Hmm.. the FISA court open up on the Trump campaign because of Papdopulus spilled the beans to a Australian diplomat and a insider in the Trump campaign told the FBI something fishy was going on.
That was before the Steele Dossier.. please try again.
Aswell as several foreign intelligence where screaming to the FBI/CIA that the Trump campaign where in constant contact with Russian officials, and where not taken to seriously.
That's about as disjointed an explanation as a Chinese acrobats preformance.
CNN will get you straighten out in the future if they cover the arrest and indictments.
Hmm.. the FISA court open up on the Trump campaign because of Papdopulus spilled the beans to a Australian diplomat and a insider in the Trump campaign told the FBI something fishy was going on.
That was before the Steele Dossier.. please try again.
Aswell as several foreign intelligence where screaming to the FBI/CIA that the Trump campaign where in constant contact with Russian officials, and where not taken to seriously.
Even then, where is the crime that justifies the start of violating over 30,000 Americans 4th Amendment?
What I don't get is this: Yes, we know factually the DOJ/NSA/Fusion GPS were illegally spying on Americans via the FISA court. They have all admitted this point. However, it's my understanding that they changed the rule moving forward so everyone had to follow the law, but all illegal activity in the past was grandfathered in. If my understanding is correct, they built in the ability to use unlawful surveilance legally and there is no crime? Someone explain what I'm missing?
The other aspect of this is the content of the surveillance, and the unmasking by the Obama administration.
Nunes indicated that the surveillance, and the unmasking had nothing to do with Russians, or Russian collusion, and was information being collected purely for political reasons.
If any laws were violated, well that still remains to be seen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northman83
Hmm.. the FISA court open up on the Trump campaign because of Papdopulus spilled the beans to a Australian diplomat and a insider in the Trump campaign told the FBI something fishy was going on.
That was before the Steele Dossier.. please try again.
Aswell as several foreign intelligence where screaming to the FBI/CIA that the Trump campaign where in constant contact with Russian officials, and where not taken to seriously.
No, as far as we know, the FISA court only granted authorization to conduct surveillance in October 2016, after the dossier was created.
There have already been reports that the dossier was in part used in the FISA court application.
The other aspect of this is the content of the surveillance, and the unmasking by the Obama administration.
Nunes indicated that the surveillance, and the unmasking had nothing to do with Russians, or Russian collusion, and was information being collected purely for political reasons.
If any laws were violated, well that still remains to be seen.
No, as far as we know, the FISA court only granted authorization to conduct surveillance in October 2016, after the dossier was created.
There have already been reports that the dossier was in part used in the FISA court application.
Peter King, told reporters that the spread sheets Susan Rice had obtained on the Trump campaign, read like daily log of all campaign team communications and then branched out to who ever they were in contact with.
Then we find out Obama himself, according to the FISA court themselves, he violated over 30,000 Americans 4th Amendment with intention & malice, not by accident like they want you to think.
This is becoming a much larger scandal than Watergate or the Pentagon Papers -- you'd think journalists would be jumping at the chance to uncover this -- but because it's democrats at the core of the scandal, no MSM journalists want to touch this hot partisan potato. It's says as much about the corruption in journalism as it does for the rest.
I hope Ryan declassifies the entire OIG-DOJ report. This report is going to shed A LOT of light on the weaponization of our intelligence community.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
