Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Remember when Barack Obama proclaimed to the whole world that the American election system was too decentralized to be hacked and/or the outcome affected? That entire notion completely disappeared the day Trump was elected. Not because Barack Obama was wrong, but because Democrats couldn't believe that Hillary in fact lost. It was at that moment that the NYT, CNN, WashPo, USA Today, and everyone of their colleagues and affiliates declared war on this President, up to and including finding every way to pin Trump's victory on collusion with Russia. The "dossier" was their evidence and their "insurance policy."
I'd say this guy is not putting forth a "novel theory" like has been expressed here. I'd say this is the beginning of the backpeddling. The NYT led this anti-Trump fight, and they stand to lose the most WHEN - NOT IF - Donald Trump is exonerated.
There has to be REAL CONSEQUENCES to the media when Trump investigation is over... they wasted our time, public money, and colluded with each other for chasing a unicorn... If the media gets off easy on this, they are allowed to do this every time a champion of the people becomes president...
Remember when Barack Obama proclaimed to the whole world that the American election system was too decentralized to be hacked and/or the outcome affected? That entire notion completely disappeared the day Trump was elected. Not because Barack Obama was wrong, but because Democrats couldn't believe that Hillary in fact lost. It was at that moment that the NYT, CNN, WashPo, USA Today, and everyone of their colleagues and affiliates declared war on this President, up to and including finding every way to pin Trump's victory on collusion with Russia. The "dossier" was their evidence and their "insurance policy."
I'd say this guy is not putting forth a "novel theory" like has been expressed here. I'd say this is the beginning of the backpeddling. The NYT led this anti-Trump fight, and they stand to lose the most WHEN - NOT IF - Donald Trump is exonerated.
So far there is no evidence that our election system was hacked. So....nice strawman there.
In this video NYT reporter Scott Shane, asks the question, what if the whole Russian collusion story is not true, and that it was a Russian misinformation operation intended to harm candidate Trump?
Reporters on Fox News are starting to saying the same thing.
Of course it was. The russians were playing both sides, hacking Hillary and feeding misinformation about Trump to Hillary's oppo team. Just like the Russians buying a bunch of "Muslims for Hillary" ads in red states and Black Lives Matter ads in inner cities. They were looking to divide us and cause chaos.
The MSM is in heavy duty CYA mode. First the NYT tried to change the subject to drunken bar stool comments by the kid, now it's a devious Russian misinformation campaign. How about putting this whole mess square on Obama and Hillary.
Mark my words. You'll know the whole gig is up when the MSM starts publishing stories about Obama and Hillary and how they thought it was their patriotic duty to save America from Trump, and all you libs will be nodding your heads in agreement.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
