Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-20-2018, 03:48 PM
 
20,757 posts, read 8,583,738 times
Reputation: 14393

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why would the democrats want a partisan memo released that had errors and inconsistencies.
No one said it has errors and inconsistencies. It's Top Secret and everyone who read it had to agree not to give details.

I heard only one Dem read the memo. Who was it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2018, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquietpath View Post
Hillary Clinton look like a girl scout....that is rich, thanks for the laugh.

Rube mentality? With such a sneering condescending attitude, I look forward to having this all out in the sunlight. Haven't you Dems eaten enough crow?

As far as us "rubes" reading, there is a bounty of information out there if you don't rely on getting your political information from The Daily Show, CNN and other comedies.

Without seeing what is in the memo, we can only rely on what HAS been provided to the public. Although heavily redacted, the FISC ruling of April 2017 shows that the abuse of FISA searches by FBI contractors was systemic over multiple years, and was the result of deliberate decision making. (their words, not mine)

The flurry of demotions and folks associated with this leaving their positions are like rats deserting a sinking ship. They know this is about to break open. I, for one, can't wait.
The memo will only tell you Nunes point of view, what exactly is the value of a partisan memo.. Same as the senate judiciary committee leaking the information on GPS but refusing to release their testimony.


The problems with FISA searches was allowing raw data to be viewed by contractors, do you have a link that it was other than that incident.


"flurry of demotions, rats deserting a sinking ship", good hyperbole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress View Post
No one said it has errors and inconsistencies. It's Top Secret and everyone who read it had to agree not to give details.

I meant Adam Schiff's comments. So what was the point of the house investigation, to release a memo. If they found something then take action.


One week earlier they had the opportunity to revise the FISA Warrants and they refused to approve, then they release a memo complaining about the FISA process. Makes no sense other than a diversion to criticize the FBI and NSA, why didn't they wait for the IG Report.


Quote:
But the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-California, characterized the memo as misleading and inaccurate. The committee, Schiff explained, had voted Thursday along party lines "to grant House Members access to a profoundly misleading set of talking points drafted by Republican staff attacking the FBI and its handling of the investigation."
"Rife with factual inaccuracies and referencing highly classified materials that most of Republican Intelligence Committee members were forced to acknowledge they had never read, this is meant only to give Republican House members a distorted view of the FBI," Schiff's statement said. "This may help carry White House water, but it is a deep disservice to our law enforcement professionals
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republi...llance-abuses/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
6,811 posts, read 6,948,599 times
Reputation: 20971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The memo will only tell you Nunes point of view, what exactly is the value of a partisan memo.. Same as the senate judiciary committee leaking the information on GPS but refusing to release their testimony.


The problems with FISA searches was allowing raw data to be viewed by contractors, do you have a link that it was other than that incident.


"flurry of demotions, rats deserting a sinking ship", good hyperbole.
Here you go:

https://www.scribd.com/document/3492...017-4#download

if that won't load, you can access it via this link:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status...307265?lang=en

Although the entire report is full of information, you can go to page 82 - 88 for a description of the violations you requested a link to.

Last edited by aquietpath; 01-20-2018 at 04:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 05:23 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,098,861 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The memo will only tell you Nunes point of view, what exactly is the value of a partisan memo.. Same as the senate judiciary committee leaking the information on GPS but refusing to release their testimony.


The problems with FISA searches was allowing raw data to be viewed by contractors, do you have a link that it was other than that incident.


"flurry of demotions, rats deserting a sinking ship", good hyperbole.
So you think we shouldn't release this memo because you think it's Nune's point of view?

The memo is a summarization of the evidence that the House intel committee collected.

The memo will outline how the FBI/DOJ created a false Russian collusion story to spy on Trump, and to undermine his presidency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquietpath View Post
Here you go:

https://www.scribd.com/document/3492...017-4#download

if that won't load, you can access it via this link:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status...307265?lang=en

Although the entire report is full of information, you can go to page 82 - 88 for a description of the violations you requested a link to.
Thanks but I I can’t open up either without an account, should be easy access somewhere since it is public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
So you think we shouldn't release this memo because you think it's Nune's point of view?

The memo is a summarization of the evidence that the House intel committee collected.

The memo will outline how the FBI/DOJ created a false Russian collusion story to spy on Trump, and to undermine his presidency.
Well according to Nunes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 05:39 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,508,677 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
So you think we shouldn't release this memo because you think it's Nune's point of view?

The memo is a summarization of the evidence that the House intel committee collected.

The memo will outline how the FBI/DOJ created a false Russian collusion story to spy on Trump, and to undermine his presidency.
I won't trust the memo to give an objective summary. I'm sure a D's summary would look very different, just as the R and D Benghazi reports were different. The D's are the obstructionists in this case, but Trump will declassify this stuff and we'll see the Facts are close to what you and the memo describe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 06:07 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,749,163 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
I won't trust the memo to give an objective summary. I'm sure a D's summary would look very different, just as the R and D Benghazi reports were different. The D's are the obstructionists in this case, but Trump will declassify this stuff and we'll see the Facts are close to what you and the memo describe.
The Democrats are going to mock Nunes' memo, question it's validity & attack Nune's credibility. They will either demand/dare the Republicans to release the supporting dodcumentation, or the R's will decide to release the supporting documentation and it will be very difficult PR-wise for the D's to obstruct the release of said documentation, since they'd been pushing for it. It may take all the way until right before the midterms for the full truth to be made public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2018, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,294 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
I won't trust the memo to give an objective summary. I'm sure a D's summary would look very different, just as the R and D Benghazi reports were different. The D's are the obstructionists in this case, but Trump will declassify this stuff and we'll see the Facts are close to what you and the memo describe.
There is supposed to be one report, Nunes has no credibility. Trump is not going to declassify anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top