Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2018, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Wasilla and Bozeman
54 posts, read 50,289 times
Reputation: 215

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Absolutely nothing you typed in that reply addressed the fallacy that tax cuts lead to job growth.
As I also said, (and you obviously ignored the rest of my post), job growth isn't simple. The fact that you point to your argument of the tax cut fallacy theory indicates that you are focused on one issue, or that you are taking a jab at Trump policy. Which is it? You can find all of the economists that you want to support your post, and I could find all kinds of economists that will refute that with facts.

"The boost to wage growth, if sustained, is truly good news," said Bankrate.com senior economic analyst Mark Hamrick in a report. "We know that there have been sectors and localities faring better than the norm, but [the September jobs report] suggests that wage growth is spreading, finally."

I for one want American's lives to be uplifted through job growth, wage growth, etc, and I am hopeful that this President will work hard to achieve that. I hope you want the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2018, 12:14 PM
 
13,961 posts, read 5,625,642 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Maybe you like reading comprehension. At no point, has anyone said the layoffs are related to the tax cuts. We are stating the trickle-down doesn’t work. Companies hire and fire as they have need, not because they have extra money in their coffers.
Once again, who advocated trickle down? Not the Laffer Curve, not supply side economics, not anyone promoting tax cuts as a method to stimulate overall economic growth...so who?

All supply side, lower tax burden economics claims is that lower taxes (along with less intrusive regulatory environment, which Trump has already been better at that any President since Coolidge) after a prolonged period of low-to-no growth should and most often does result in an increase in overall economic growth, and that on average, everyone benefits from a growing economy.

But nobody sells "trickle down" theory because the theory itself doesn't actually exist outside Democrat political rhetoric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
It’s a refutation of trickle down.
No, it isn't. "Operating Profit" is not the same as "Net Profit."

"Personal care companies are struggling as stores compete with online retailers by offering discounts or creating their own private label products."


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot1 View Post
Obama increased the debt far more than all other Presidents COMBINED, and NOW you're worried about increased debt? That seems very hypocritical. What has Trump done to increase the debt, and don't say the tax cuts as they will grow the economy, and increase tax revenue.
Presidents do not have the ability to increase debt. Congress has the power of the purse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 07:23 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,445,026 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbernard View Post
BS. Jobs were being added monthly for years now. The economy rebounded and was booming under Obama.
Ironic...2017 saw LESS jobs added than just 2016 (and even 2015 I think).
#fakenews
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Canada
28 posts, read 13,714 times
Reputation: 27
It's a company restructuring, they are moving to fewer sites and rationalising production, they also may invest in more automation etc.

If you can make the same product more cheaply using less manpower then you are going to in order to become more competitive, it's simple economics, especially when faced with increasing discount brands and discount supermarket offers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 08:31 AM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,384,859 times
Reputation: 10258
Quote:
Originally Posted by gladhands View Post
Maybe you like reading comprehension. At no point, has anyone said the layoffs are related to the tax cuts. We are stating the trickle-down doesn’t work. Companies hire and fire as they have need, not because they have extra money in their coffers.
LOL. sure that's what you are saying. and you are utterly and completely wrong.


in case you missed it, as a direct result of the tax bill, Apple just announced 350BILLION Dollars being repatriated, hiring of 20k more people and building a new headquarters.


Starbucks just announced pay raises and expanded benefits.


This tread is ABOUT layoffs and that being PROOF that the tax cuts don't do anything. you need to comprehend your own argument.


bottom line, the tax cuts have already started to work toward expanding wealth among the middle class. I am saddened that you are mad about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top