Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama was literally a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. Guess where Farrakhan lives?
The fact that they have worked together was never a secret. As a matter of fact, Hillary tried to use Farrakhan against Obama in 2008. No one buried anything. If you didn’t know about it, it’s probably because you are a low-information voter.
Ok, let's think about that statement for a minute. What would be the motivation of EVERY news organization (sans Fox, Breitbart, and the National Enquirer) to all get together and decide to launch this massive campaign, solely aimed at dethroning Trump ? Have we ever seen this before to this degree ?
Conversely, what would make all of them band together to protect and cover for Hillary and Obama ? What would be in it for them ?
The answer is, all of these various and varied news organizations are simply reporting WHAT THEY OBSERVE. Your team may have blinders on, but the rest of the world does not. The things the news people report are exactly what is happening and what Trump is saying and doing. You may not like hearing the truth, but the truth is the truth.......period.
Good questions... I'll bring them up at the next JournoList meeting.
Good questions... I'll bring them up at the next JournoList meeting.
And you don't think like minded people share information all the time. So what?
As soon as the RNC talking points goes out to their media, congress, senate and staffers, my friend a Republican precinct captain in Alabama gets it, too.
Obama was literally a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. Guess where Farrakhan lives?
The fact that they have worked together was never a secret. As a matter of fact, Hillary tried to use Farrakhan against Obama in 2008. No one buried anything. If you didn’t know about it, it’s probably because you are a low-information voter.
the photographer says the picture he took of bammers and louie together was buried.
are you calling him a liar?
“After the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration; then for eight years after he was president, it was kept under cover,” Muhammad said. “It absolutely would have made a difference.”
Your team may have blinders on, but the rest of the world does not.
This is where your post crashed into the ditch.
First of all, "we" are not a team. We are salt of the earth Americans who voted for Trump. We actually did. We really really did, on purpose, aka we meant to, and we will do it again. We were not Russian colluded nor were we obstructed into it.
Secondly, you are saying we (y'all) are always right and true and y'all (we) are never right and never true.
Let me clue you in on a little fact about this universe. "Always" and "Never" are both lies.
Muhammad said he thought the photograph would be “damaging politically” if it were released and was afraid that someone might “break into his apartment” looking for it, like “that Watergate crap.”
There has to be something more to this story.
The picture was taken in 2005, when Obama was a junior Senator. No one knew at that time that Obama was going to be President one day. So this story is incomplete.
the photographer says the picture he took of bammers and louie together was buried.
are you calling him a liar?
“After the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration; then for eight years after he was president, it was kept under cover,” Muhammad said. “It absolutely would have made a difference.”
Who knows if it would have made a difference? Muhammad is simply proffering an opinion. And the picture was taken in 2005. There is something missing from this story.
And you don't think like minded people share information all the time. So what?
As soon as the RNC talking points goes out to their media, congress, senate and staffers, my friend a Republican precinct captain in Alabama gets it, too.
The duty of a "free" press is to unbiasedly report the news... not conspire to shape the news to their biases.
Muhammad said he thought the photograph would be “damaging politically” if it were released and was afraid that someone might “break into his apartment” looking for it, like “that Watergate crap.”
He's paranoid then since when did taking a photo (unless it was with Hitler or your mistress) become “damaging politically”?
Obviously Obama didn't feel that way or he would have objected to being in the photo.
So funny watching the excuses coming from the Left for Obama hanging out with a racist.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
