Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Anybody who doubts that Nikki the Political Shark is above trying to sleep her way to the top needs their head examined. And we know Trump would hump an abandoned Volkswagen if he thought there was a possum living in it.
Nikki is only at the UN so that Trump could get her out of the way for his bootlicker McMaster to be installed as governor of SC. She is at his complete command and disposal there, and reports only to him. If she is fired she has no place to go, and if she is as smart as she has been reputed to be, she has figured that out by now. Draw your own conclusions.
Most significant is that his base includes such a high percentage of avowedly conservative evangelical Christians...
I'm just curious, as I see this assertion bandied about willy nilly, do you have a citation to a statistic for the number of avowedly conservative evangelical Christians that comprise this high percentage of Trump's base?
The only words that can describe how low this Wolffe character is are ones that would and should be censored. He is truly scum, low beyond low. And any show that puts him on is the same. They are both disgusting filth.
I am watching news flow from last elections. I have started with everything is bad with Trump and amazing with Clinton attitude and reached to different conclusions so far. Truth is somewhere in between. Based on text messages from top level FBI employees and effort to hide information, there is a little truth to some of Trump mirror conspiracy theories. Other side is basically most of MSM, most of D's and lot of R's.
I have a different take on the text messages. Don't forget these are in the know people in the FBI. When I see a text from an FBI agent declaring that it's frightening if Trump wins, then I want to know what he knows. We only know a very small segment of what the intelligence communities know. To form an honest unbiased opinion we would need to know all of the information, which of course is impossible.
So we have top notch career people with a negative opinion of Trump, and we have a president that lies and creates drama. We have a president that appears to be in full cover up mode. Which side seems more credible? Unfortunately, that depends on what you want to believe for some people. Other people research and put two and two together. If you live in a Hannity bubble then you will believe the conspiracy theories as gospel. I watched him back track on Trump trying to fire Mueller IRL after I watched CNN report that Trump tried to fire Mueller. I like to watch Hannity's extreme partisan spin and the flip side on CNN. Then I research.
I've recently become interested in Wynn and his role in the RNC. He's a casino owner from Vegas. What do you think of when you hear Vegas? Mafia? That's the stereotype. What if mob money is being donated to the RNC? That's the spin. It's salacious, gossip is fun. Do I spread this conspiracy theory that the mob is in control of the RNC or do I research it? Well that depends on how deplorable and low you want to go.
While it may be fun to some to disparage the tens of thousands of FBI agents over a few cherry picked text messages that spread a negative light on Trump, is it deplorable? Well that depends on if you live in a Hannity bubble. If you research and look at the time line you will discover that Mueller was hired in May and the agent and attorney were gone by July. Very early on in the investigation.
So yes you're right that there is some truth to Trump's conspiracy theories, but is it because that's what you want to believe?
I have a different take on the text messages. Don't forget these are in the know people in the FBI. When I see a text from an FBI agent declaring that it's frightening if Trump wins, then I want to know what he knows. We only know a very small segment of what the intelligence communities know. To form an honest unbiased opinion we would need to know all of the information, which of course is impossible.
So we have top notch career people with a negative opinion of Trump, and we have a president that lies and creates drama. We have a president that appears to be in full cover up mode. Which side seems more credible?
?
FBI people are entitled to the own opinions. But they are not entitled to sabotage elections. Not to save us from ourselves or any other reason. That's what happened in 2016, MAYBE. Anyway, there is much more evidence for this theory than for the Russia collusion theory, for which there is absolutely no evidence.
Anybody who doubts that Nikki the Political Shark is above trying to sleep her way to the top needs their head examined. And we know Trump would hump an abandoned Volkswagen if he thought there was a possum living in it.
Nikki is only at the UN so that Trump could get her out of the way for his bootlicker McMaster to be installed as governor of SC. She is at his complete command and disposal there, and reports only to him. If she is fired she has no place to go, and if she is as smart as she has been reputed to be, she has figured that out by now. Draw your own conclusions.
I do think Haley is a shark but Wolff never named Haley. Trump supporters are getting all worked up in their own heads.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
