Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is why I don't trust any of the MSM news sources.
Some of Trumps picks are straight out of the CFR and are Bonafide Globalists
Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court is a CFR member
Lieutenant General McMaster, Trump's new national security adviser
Robert Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative
Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao
Rex Tillerson
Steven Mnuchin, Trump's treasury secretary
Texas Governor Rick Perry, a Republican who serves as Trump's energy secretary is a Bilderberg Attendee
Secretary of Defense James Mattis is a Bilderberg Attendee
The late U.S. Admiral Chester Ward, for example, who served as the Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy, was a CFR member for 16 years before resigning in disgust. “In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as America First,” said Admiral Ward, whose comments on the CFR shed light on why the group would be entirely hostile to Trump's central promise as a pro-America, anti-establishment political candidate.
But it's even worse than that. “The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government,” the admiral warned, adding that “this lust to surrender the sovereignty and independence of the United States is pervasive throughout most of the membership.” In other words, not everyone in the CFR is a fanatical globalist determined to sell out America's sovereignty, but most are.
How can anyone trust Assange's ravings? He's a fugitive and too depressed to think clearly.
And, frankly, it is rather hilarious for a guy who works for propaganda-based RT to be criticizing other media.
"...Julian Assange has pleaded for a warrant for his arrest to be cancelled so he can leave the Ecuadorian embassy as he is suffering from "depression and a terribly bad tooth"..."
Yep, my wife and I watch the BBC every now and again because it comes off unbiased. Sometimes you have to look from the outside to get to the truth on the inside.
BBC's bias is understated but still sharp. They do not have a competing network giving the other side of the story like you have in the US, so there is no need to try to shout over anyone. You get your bias served to you in a more softened tone, but with no rebuttal. Similar to the US before Fox came around.
free press still exists. there is nothing preventing you from starting a publication.
the problem is it's more of a financial and labor burden then most people are willing to commit to.
That's technically true, but if you create a independent media outlet, and report things counter to the msm, the msm attacks you, calling you a racist, homophobe, xenophobe, or a Russian bot.
This is why I don't trust any of the MSM news sources.
Don't trust anybody -- they are all out to get you........mwahahahhahahaha.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
