Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL! According to who, Fox News? You guys are pathetic.
While initial poster's message was exaggerated, it's becoming pretty clear that his administration did weaponize federal agencies to target political opponents. This would seem to include the FBI if the memo in question is substantiated. That would mean that not only did the FBI coordinate with the Attorney General to go easy on Clinton, they also used a dubious dossier, funded by the Clinton campaign and DNC to obtain FISA warrants to snoop on political opponents.
If the roles were reversed, and this were a GOP administration using government agencies to target political opponents, you know you would be concerned.
No he doesn't because it's not true and it's been refuted repeatedly. It was 400k and it came from McAuliffes PAC, a PAC that contributed larger amounts than that to two other Democratic candidates. The game cons play with this is guilt by association. Clinton knows McAuliffe so she must have had McAuliffe donate the money with some sort of quid pro quo. This nonsense never stops in Cult 45 fantasyland.
Of course he was pushed out, and I think the purge at the top will continue, until the only people who still work are those who have sworn loyalty to Herr mini-mussolini in WH.
You may want to check what the New York Times, and CBS are reporting before you make partisan assumptions. Both are now reporting McCabe was facing a demotion based on an internal OIG investigation, and resigned in lieu of accepting a demotion, not pressure from the WH.
You may want to check what the New York Times, and CBS are reporting before you make partisan assumptions. Both are now reporting McCabe was facing a demotion based on an internal OIG investigation, and resigned in lieu of accepting a demotion, not pressure from the WH.
Public shamings by Trump, seeing the president drag your wife into it, hints of demotions, etc pretty much define "getting pushed out". What else do you think 'pushed out' means?
Public shamings by Trump, seeing the president drag your wife into it, hints of demotions, etc pretty much define "getting pushed out".
You conveniently ignored the substance, as expected. McCabe was facing a demotion, based on an internal FBI OIG investigation, not pressure from the WH. He resigned rather than accept it. Are you now going to blame the NYT, and CBS, both known for their overt conservative bias for skewing their stories?
If Trump had nothing to hide why is he trying to get people tied to the investigation fired? An honest man wouldn’t be worried. Watch Faux snooze and I’m sure they will tell you what you want to hear.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The game cons play with this is guilt by association. Clinton knows McAuliffe so she must have had McAuliffe donate the money with some sort of quid pro quo. This nonsense never stops in Cult 45 fantasyland.
