Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Go check Trump's tweets. It's a steady stream of smearing the FBI and DOJ.
All over doing their job of monitoring Carter Page, a guy who during during Trump's campaign gave a speech in Russia running down the U.S. A guy who has been warned for years about keeping company with Russian agent recruiters. A guy who brags about being a "Kremlin advisor."
Hard to believe Americans are posting such BS as "no smear campaign."
Evidence gathering takes years. Mueller has plenty - and has no obligation to divulge to the public - UNTIL HE BRINGS AN INDICTMENT - what that evidence is.
So, the fact that there is "nothing out there" bodes VERY POORLY for Trump. It is always what you don't know that trips people up over time.
The delusional can continue to say "oh, but there's nothing out there" - which shows how LITTLE they really KNOW about the process. Clearly the 'little grey cells' are not their strong suit - sorta clones of their leader in that way.
There are two different types of evidence in question here.
Evidence of who committed a crime is one type. Before an investigation is undertaken to determine who committed a crime, you first have to have evidence that a crime was actually committed. So far the only evidence that a crime was committed seems to point to the fraud in obtaining the FISA warrants.
There are two different types of evidence in question here.
Evidence of who committed a crime is one type. Before an investigation is undertaken to determine who committed a crime, you first have to have evidence that a crime was actually committed. So far the only evidence that a crime was committed seems to point to the fraud in obtaining the FISA warrants.
The "fraud" in obtaining the FISA warrants has not even been proven in the public court of opinion.
If the FISA request did not disclose that one piece of evidence on Page (dossier) was procured through opposition research (possible bias), then you might have something. Especially if the FISA warrant was granted solely on that.
The info being "leaked" by those who have seen the warrant request claim that didn't happen. That is was made clear that a political entity paid for the dossier, BUT, the facts from the dossier about Page were further investigated and found to be true.
If these leaks are accurate, there has been no fraud in obtaining the FISA warrant.
I'm curious to see when the Obamas and the Clintons decide to take an extended vacation to a country with no extradition treaty to the US.
I think Barry is safe if he returns to Kenya. Not sure where Hillary can disappear to....Haiti?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
