Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your point? Can you address the post to which your above response was attached? Thanks.
It's his way of saying "I know this is dishonest hypocrisy since we just rushed Nunes out under the guise of 'transparency', but I'm happy to play the role of gloating Trump troll anyways."
How is this ANYTHING BUT HYPOCRISY from conservatives?
You guys can't defend this. You know damn well that over doctored version was pushed it as "transparency" and "truth," and now the other side of the story will be suppressed forever - or at least until it can be watered down by Trump allies.
If this is clear evidence that Trump and his followers lack integrity.
If Trump would have released it the left would be crying he is compromising national security. Dems spiked the memo to create a no win situation. That's the only thing they are transparent about.
The bottom line is the truth is coming out, one way or the other, and the Dems will regret it come election time.
Some of that truth is this newly revealed pipeline of Clinton info going into the State Dept which parallels the Steele info by two of the Clintons good buddies from the past, Cody Shearer, private investigator, and Sydney Bloomenthal.
Steve Bannon was perhaps spied on as well.
Russians via Christopher Steele and the Clinton Campaign associates are the authors of the Steele Dossier which provided the bulk of the material that went to those Fisa judges.
No amount of Democratic memos will change that fact, the fact that the FISA court was weaponized to go after a political opponent in a US election.
Now the latest, US spies paid $100k to Russian operatives for dirt on Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks
Page was under surveillance before the Steele dossier was created.
Carter Page is in good standing with the FBI yesterday today and tomorrow, what's your point, putting aside lamestream fakestream Mainstream media talking points?
I'm going to agree with the many liberals here a week ago claiming the memo was classified material and should not be released.
That would hold true here also. I agree with them, don't release the memo.
According to the Democrat left, classified material - sources and methods - should only not be released when it is Republicans trying to do it.
When they are trying to do it, it should of course be allowed and even welcome, and any effort to impede the release of this sort of compromising information is cause for selfish bellicose wailing, as we are now witnessing.
As predicted Adam Schiff was playing games, and packed his memo full of methods, and sources knowing his memo would either be heavily redacted, or not be able to be release.
The Director of National Intelligence, and the FBI stated that release of the memo would harm national security.
Expect Schiff to run to the media to whine.
Why wouldn't Schiff just write a memo that could be released un-redacted like Republicans did?
President Trump will not declassify the memo from Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee as it currently is written, the White House announced in a letter Friday night. The Democrats' memo is a rebuttal to the GOP memo about surveillance of a former Trump campaign official is expected to be released soon
On Friday, the president met with FBI Director Christopher Wray, the principal associate deputy attorney general and the White House counsel's office to discuss the Democratic memo, according to the White House.
Some of that truth is this newly revealed pupeline of Clinton info going into the State Dept which parallels the Steele info by two of the Clintons good buddies from the past, Cody Shearer, private investigator, and Sydney Bloomenthal.
Steve Bannon was perhaps spied on as well.
Russians via Christopher Steele and the Clinton Campaign associates are the authors of the Steele Dossier which provided the bulk of the material that went to those Fisa judges.
No amount of Democratic memos will.change that fact, the fact that the FISA court was weaponized to go after a political opponent in a US election.
Page was under surveillance before the Steele dossier was created.
I'm going to agree with the many liberals here a week ago claiming the memo was classified material and should not be released.
That would hold true here also. I agree with them, don't release the memo.
You supported release of Nunes memo.
NOW you oppose release of counterpoint memo.
That by definition makes you a hypocrite.
Nice dishonest revisionist history you push here.
The first memo probably shouldn't have been released but SINCE YOU GUYS released it, the second one should follow suit.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
