Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:44 AM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,340,526 times
Reputation: 7030

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Obama never would have been President. He couldn't have passed. So, I say, yes!
Right. It would have been disclosed that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:48 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,594,254 times
Reputation: 15336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungalove View Post
Absolutely. If the people who support the military have to have background checks (i.e. DOD civilians), then why shouldn't the Commander in Chief? It should work the same for the head as for the foundation.
I strongly disagree, the commander in chief is elected by the public.

I believe BG checks should be done away with for most jobs anyway, I understand why they are needed for bank employees, child care, etc, but to work in a distribution center, factory, gas station..CMON, thats going a little overboard imo. working conditions were actually safer in the days before most jobs did BG checks too, so that is interesting in itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Chicago area
18,759 posts, read 11,794,120 times
Reputation: 64167
I think all of the candidates considering a run for any political office anywhere should have a back ground check. Whenever we apply for a job a background check is done. Our employers want to know who they're hiring. Public officials work for us, and as their employer we deserve to know everything about them. I think it's time for super pack money to stop buying our elected officials as well. We have a system that invites corruption. Knowing who's on the take is one step closer to draining the swamp. So is knowing about all of those skeletons in their closets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,214,152 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Placing additional qualifications at the party level would be the ruin of that party. Virtue checking only has so much legal standing.
As I said, It would be Unconstitutional to do so, unless the Constitution is amended to add the additional qualification requirement. The Constitution cannot be altered by legislation. Or do you think otherwise?
I do not see how the requirement of the party could be unconstitutional. The person running then has the option of going independent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:55 AM
 
7,800 posts, read 4,399,488 times
Reputation: 9438
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
And if it was the other way around Hillary would have instantly been disqualified.
Trump would have arrested. He wouldn't have been approved to clean the toilets in a secure facility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:57 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by EveryLady View Post
Right. It would have been disclosed that Obama wasn't born in Hawaii after all.
Actually, that Frank Marshall Davis was his real dad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:58 AM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,340,526 times
Reputation: 7030
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Actually, that Frank Marshall Davis was his real dad.
Gosh. I hadn't heard that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,214,152 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
In other words a person must relinquish all their god given rights, just to have a privilege to beg for your vote?

You already want Trump to give up his first Amendment, why not the 2nd, 4th and 5th... Who cares, right?
A person needs to apply for the job, we require a solid back ground. He refused to give his entire back ground. That is why today we have a POTUS who may be being black mailed by Putin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 10:01 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
I do not see how the requirement of the party could be unconstitutional. The person running then has the option of going independent.
As I said before, just like Trump did. As Conservative as I am, I can register as a Democrat tomorrow and place my name on the ballot. The party just runs funding.

As liberal as Trump was, He registered as a Republican. The RNC gave him no funding until the very end and it was not much in comparison to past Presidents but by a tiny fraction.

Trump did it his way without being influenced by the money given(bought off)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2018, 10:03 AM
 
8,502 posts, read 3,340,526 times
Reputation: 7030
There's a larger issue here.

We are one of the world's oldest democracies (Haiti maybe beat us out?) where the Constitution mandated a Presidential system. Here, the president is voted for directly by the people. In contrast, in a Parliamentarian system the party head becomes prime minister.

Not advocating for one compared to the other but both have their drawbacks - depending how history plays out. But arguably in a Parliamentarian system you DO end up with a well-vetted chief executive from the time spent working his/her way up the ranks.

What is kind of interesting is that MOST of the world democracies ended choosing a Parliamentarian system. About the only other Presidential systems are in Latin America and Central Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top