Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:57 AM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,767,629 times
Reputation: 7650

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Not just a racist statement, but an untrue statement. Cultures all over the world have worn braids for millennia. Black people do not “own” braided hair, anymore than they “own” hoop earrings. It’s asinine. These kids are the product of a cult created by professors in college that has flowed into the wider culture through the internet. When are people going to say enough is enough?
+ 1

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2018, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,453 posts, read 7,081,915 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol View Post
I'm using what I believe to be the commonly accepted (and readily searchable) definition.
It seems that you either don't know what that is, or are using your own "mystical definition"
You're the one making the claim that I'm wrong.

And yet you're reluctant to explain how and why you think I'm wrong.

Besides, what difference does the dictionary definition make if it's not the one used by the SJW types across the media, web and college campuses every day?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 12:46 PM
 
16,543 posts, read 8,584,349 times
Reputation: 19375
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol View Post
Sexual harassment and cultural appropriation both have actual definitions.

It may behoove you to know them

Then again, it may not if you're not willing to have reasoned adult discussion about the topics


Though I agree we should all be having an adult discussion, your condescending reply to that poster was not helpful.

Just because liberal malcontents make up new reasons to divide people for their own purposes does not mean their claims are valid.
So just because a new or different phrase is concocted to try and justify said grievance, does not mean it's "actual definition" has validity.

I am reminded of this scene in a movie where the person goes from being normal to being convinced they are a victim;


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uciVCnUYeuc



The race hustlers like Sharpton and liberal Democrats like Obama & Co are perfect examples of why race relations have gotten worse in recent years, because now people have been convinced they have chips on their shoulders where none had existed before.





`
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:12 PM
 
3,565 posts, read 1,920,365 times
Reputation: 3732
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post
You're the one making the claim that I'm wrong.
I'm saying that what you're claiming is cultural appropriation is not actually cultural appropriation per the accepted definition,

Quote:
And yet you're reluctant to explain how and why you think I'm wrong.
I just explained it, again.

Quote:
Besides, what difference does the dictionary definition make if it's not the one used by the SJW types across the media, web and college campuses every day?
Interesting
You're aspiring to use the same rationale as people whose rational you disagree with?




Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1 View Post


Though I agree we should all be having an adult discussion, your condescending reply to that poster was not helpful.

Just because liberal malcontents
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,453 posts, read 7,081,915 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol View Post
I'm saying that what you're claiming is cultural appropriation is not actually cultural appropriation per the accepted definition,


I just explained it, again.


Interesting
You're aspiring to use the same rationale as people whose rational you disagree with?









So why not just tell me what your accepted definition is?


Because I'm not the one claiming the examples I used are actually cultural appropriation.....


The SJW types protesting those things are.

Personally, I think the entire concept is a crock of manure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:30 PM
 
3,565 posts, read 1,920,365 times
Reputation: 3732
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatBob96 View Post

Personally, I think the entire concept is a crock of manure.
But, you don't even know what it is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top