Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes they do and thank you for making my point for me.
It is exactly why Obama made the choice to use him because of his paintings, his history and his choice of subject matter. Because deep down in the "place you don't about at cocktail parties..." he despises white people hates the white america paradigm and HE chose an artist aligned with those views.
i'm beginning to think the outrage over the obama paintings are a calculated campaign to keep the public's eye off all the scandalous things going on in the white house and with the russian meddling.
Your question is BS but I'd rather have hidden sperm in a painting than a wife beater with no security clearance as the president's right hand man in the White House.
But that isn't what I asked...a POTUS choosing a white supremacist artist...you would not be bothered?
This quote is from the OP's link:
Quote:
It is not the case, however, that Wiley was “famous for depicting black people killing white people” before politically motivated commentators chose to make it so. Far from it. Of the scores of paintings the artist has produced, only the two based on the biblical beheading story depict such a scene. They generated very little controversy before Wiley’s portrait of Obama was publicly unveiled.
The man is hardly a virulent racist based on what I have read.
Your question is BS but I'd rather have hidden sperm in a painting than a wife beater with no security clearance as the president's right hand man in the White House.
Obama won and got out of the White House without a single scandal. You’d better worry about the cabal working at the White House right now instead of dredging up memories of Reverend Wright.
Can you enlighten us all as to the choice of artist in the very first place. Could Obama not have selected another black artist.....and there are many to choose from.
It does appear that Obama was creating as much racial rancor he could manage as his star begins to fizzle into oblivion.
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 27 days ago)
27,647 posts, read 16,129,622 times
Reputation: 19062
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
Your question is BS but I'd rather have hidden sperm in a painting than a wife beater with no security clearance as the president's right hand man in the White House.
The thread is about the fact that they selected a painter who advocates killing white people...or was that to difficult?
Is that what the painter told you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD
the POTUS choice just as he chose Wright. He is consistent in those choices no?
There’s not one damn thing wrong with Wright. He served his country and earned the right to say anything he wants. He didn’t run for any office, and didnt ask for your consent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
