Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-13-2018, 10:56 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,772 posts, read 44,561,469 times
Reputation: 13610

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Is that what the painter told you?
He told the press that, yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2018, 11:01 PM
 
56,990 posts, read 35,105,807 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
He told the press that, yes.
Post it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 11:04 PM
 
56,990 posts, read 35,105,807 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Sure, just as long as everyone understands it was extremely racist in the 'Hate Whitey' vein, and he was Obama's Spiritual Advisor for 20+ years.
The real issue here is that Obama ever had a spiritual advisor. That’s the scandal here. That it was Reverend Wright is here nor there.

Hell, any non obsequious African American hates whitey in your eyes so that’s no big deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 11:04 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,772 posts, read 44,561,469 times
Reputation: 13610
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Post it.
It's already in this thread, twice. The Snopes link, and New York Magazine link.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 11:08 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,772 posts, read 44,561,469 times
Reputation: 13610
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
The real issue here is that Obama ever had a spiritual advisor. That’s the scandal here. That it was Reverend Wright is here nor there.
No, the problem was Wright's 'Hate Whitey' belief system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 06:44 AM
 
56,990 posts, read 35,105,807 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, the problem was Wright's 'Hate Whitey' belief system.
Obama won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 06:48 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,772 posts, read 44,561,469 times
Reputation: 13610
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Obama won.
On a "Hate Whitey" platform, of which most of his voters were ignorant. Make you feel better?

Even in parting, Obama commissioned a 'Kill Whitey' artist to compose his portrait for the Smithsonian.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 07:01 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,204 posts, read 19,112,393 times
Reputation: 38266
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD View Post
The thread is about the fact that they selected a painter who advocates killing white people...or was that to difficult?
Again, your teachers would be very sad to find out that you think that's what this quote means.

Quote:
It’s sort of a play on the ‘kill whitey’ thing,” Wiley said in a 2012 interview with New York Magazine. The operative word is “play.” What is all too easy to miss on a cursory glance is the deeply conceptual nature of these works.
Claiming that the artist advocates killing white people is quite simply a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 07:01 AM
 
Location: UK
90 posts, read 136,049 times
Reputation: 61
Obama should have known better than to go with this artist or his handlers should have known. Obviously the artist's background and portfolio would come out...or did he think no one would care??

Although one might be able to argue it's 'art' and has deeper meaning, one could also argue the painting has a more insidious 'face-value' message as we see on this board.

The painters past work struck me as work that should have plainly rendered this artist an inappropriate choice.

Playing Devil's Advocate...I guess people can raise up their confederate flags back since it's all open to cultural interpretation and who cares what a large percentage of people might feel about it?

Last edited by lightblue; 02-14-2018 at 07:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 07:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,772 posts, read 44,561,469 times
Reputation: 13610
Quote:
Originally Posted by emm74 View Post
Claiming that the artist advocates killing white people is quite simply a lie.
"Killing whitey" (artist's own words) is a lie? How so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top