Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2018, 07:40 PM
 
45,577 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23882

Advertisements

A FACEBOOK EXECUTIVE APOLOGIZES TO HIS COMPANY—AND TO ROBERT MUELLER

But then, roughly eight hours after the indictment appeared online, Rob Goldman, a VP for ads for Facebook, decided he had a few points to add to the debate. He was just freelancing, and had not cleared his thoughts with either Facebook’s communications team or its senior management.

...
The tweetstorm started to spread in the early hours of Saturday. It caught the attention of the president of Pro Publica, one of the organizations that has been most critical of Facebook’s advertising practice. The former deputy communications director of the Clinton campaign noted it too.

And then, the message caught the attention of America’s Tweeter in Chief. And so on Saturday, right about when Facebook’s executives would have been sitting down for lunch, @realdonaldtrump decided that he wanted to introduce his 48 million followers to Rob Goldman.

...
That’s when, according to executives at the company, Facebook realized it was holding a sh-- sandwich. It’s also when the company realized Goldman’s more subtle error: He had made it look like his company was repudiating the work of Robert Mueller.



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...55496137535488


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...56781670694912


Basically he tweeted that most of the Russian ads occurred after the election... And he had seen all of the ads, and swaying the election was NOT the main goal of the Russians

Oops...

Last edited by DRob4JC; 02-20-2018 at 08:28 PM.. Reason: grammar
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2018, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,357,575 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
The majority of the Russian ad spend happened AFTER the election. We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesn’t align with the main media narrative of Tump and the election. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/10...d-to-congress/ …
This poor SOB better have eyes in the back of his head with the crowd he just upset by telling the world this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 11:17 AM
 
45,577 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23882
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
This poor SOB better have eyes in the back of his head with the crowd he just upset by telling the world this.
I don't think it will be that bad for him... pending how much play it gets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 11:21 AM
 
13,711 posts, read 9,230,680 times
Reputation: 9845
So what?

The bolt of Russia' meddling is through fake news and troll posts, NOT ADS.

We just discovered the a very popular pro-Trump reddit sub that was occasionally referenced on this very board as evidence of great Trump love is in fact almost exclusively population by Russian bots and trolls.

In fact, this is from the article:

Quote:

The obvious error was asserting that one could understand the scope of the Russian propaganda campaign just through the ads. Russia’s ads were viewed roughly 11 million times, while posts by Russia-controlled accounts had been viewed 150 million times. Leaving aside pure numbers, anyone who had read the indictment knew that ads were a minute part of the operation. Facebook likes to point out that the Russians only spent a hundred thousand dollars on all their ads, a rather small number in comparison to the $1.25 million that the indictment reveals Russia’s Internet Research Agency was spending monthly on its election influence campaign.

The OBVIOUS problem here is that Trump and his enablers tried to latch on to this one irrelevant fact (most ads were purchased after the election) as if it somehow invalidates everything else and exonerates him. Which is bogus.

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 11:36 AM
 
2,007 posts, read 1,274,664 times
Reputation: 1858
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I don't think it will be that bad for him... pending how much play it gets.
If anything it does restore a certain degree of confidence in hearing good ole fashioned unbiased truth, albeit for a short time before the retraction.

Well, at the very least we are making progress. Baby steps again allover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 11:41 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,004,475 times
Reputation: 15559
Wouldn't Trump have the whole indictment that Mueller did -- why would he be looking to Facebook guy tweeting for information?

He is one odd man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 12:25 PM
 
45,577 posts, read 27,172,269 times
Reputation: 23882
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Wouldn't Trump have the whole indictment that Mueller did -- why would he be looking to Facebook guy tweeting for information?

He is one odd man.
Do you not understand that you could be reading something totally unrelated and end up seeing a link to this Facebook exec's account?

Maybe he was wiretapping him... maybe Trump has a keystroke logger that he is monitoring...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Gaston, South Carolina
15,713 posts, read 9,519,061 times
Reputation: 17617
He should be fired. A Facebook exec using Twitter? Sheesh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 01:24 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,746,643 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
A FACEBOOK EXECUTIVE APOLOGIZES TO HIS COMPANY—AND TO ROBERT MUELLER

But then, roughly eight hours after the indictment appeared online, Rob Goldman, a VP for ads for Facebook, decided he had a few points to add to the debate. He was just freelancing, and had not cleared his thoughts with either Facebook’s communications team or its senior management.

...
The tweetstorm started to spread in the early hours of Saturday. It caught the attention of the president of Pro Publica, one of the organizations that has been most critical of Facebook’s advertising practice. The former deputy communications director of the Clinton campaign noted it too.

And then, the message caught the attention of America’s Tweeter in Chief. And so on Saturday, right about when Facebook’s executives would have been sitting down for lunch, @realdonaldtrump decided that he wanted to introduce his 48 million followers to Rob Goldman.

...
That’s when, according to executives at the company, Facebook realized it was holding a sh-- sandwich. It’s also when the company realized Goldman’s more subtle error: He had made it look like his company was repudiating the work of Robert Mueller.



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...55496137535488


https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...56781670694912


Basically he tweeted that most of the Russian ads occurred after the election... And he had seen all of the ads, and swaying the election was NOT the main goal of the Russians

Oops...
He was factually correct, most of the ads did occur after the election & the goal was not to elect Donald Trump. Too bad he works at a company where his thoughts did not align with company left wing politics & he had to retract the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2018, 01:26 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,746,643 times
Reputation: 5007
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
So what?

The bolt of Russia' meddling is through fake news and troll posts, NOT ADS.

We just discovered the a very popular pro-Trump reddit sub that was occasionally referenced on this very board as evidence of great Trump love is in fact almost exclusively population by Russian bots and trolls.

In fact, this is from the article:




The OBVIOUS problem here is that Trump and his enablers tried to latch on to this one irrelevant fact (most ads were purchased after the election) as if it somehow invalidates everything else and exonerates him. Which is bogus.

.
Exonerates him from what? He's been charged with no crime & there's no collusion with Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top