Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mexican people are already a blend of two or more races. Yet that has hardly prevented them from being "racist", either in the sense of being race-centric (La Raza) or of having negative views of others based on race.
Mexico is easily the most racist country in all of Latin America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeaveWI
There goes the Republican party!!
LOL. Nope. But it would mean that blacks would be getting the shaft under that policy. So now you're probably not so gleeful, eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat
Only in your troubled mind. Perhaps you need to read the definition of genocide.
Demographic change is not genocide.
You have an outdated or inaccurate definition. Demographic change is merely the result of genocidal practices or an element of the larger scheme. International Law defines genocide correctly, it is not only killing. Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(1948) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
I've highlighted in red for you the elements that in play in Western Nations, promoted by global communists, that qualify as the "White Genocide" to which we all have been referring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC
The idea that co-mingling races ends racism is false.
That's what causes racism/conflict between cultures.
Racial hatred doesn't exist in places where there is physical distance and separation between cultures/races.
You don't have asian jokes in the US in communities with few asians, for example.
Bingo. Its forced multi-culturalism and forced mass-immigration that cause most racial conflicts. Racial conflict doesn't really exist in peaceful natural societies. Unless another group is introduced by means of force, there is no mechanism by which a society can become multi-racial.
Mexico is easily the most racist country in all of Latin America.
LOL. Nope. But it would mean that blacks would be getting the shaft under that policy. So now you're probably not so gleeful, eh?
You have an outdated or inaccurate definition. Demographic change is merely the result of genocidal practices or an element of the larger scheme. International Law defines genocide correctly, it is not only killing. Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide(1948) as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
I've highlighted in red for you the elements that in play in Western Nations, promoted by global communists, that qualify as the "White Genocide" to which we all have been referring.
Bingo. Its forced multi-culturalism and forced mass-immigration that cause most racial conflicts. Racial conflict doesn't really exist in peaceful natural societies. Unless another group is introduced by means of force, there is no mechanism by which a society can become multi-racial.
I read your definition. What’s happening is still in no way “white genocide”. IMO, it shows an ignorance of, or disregard for history to use the term “genocide” so cavalierly.
Last edited by Bureaucat; 02-25-2018 at 12:39 PM..
Bingo. Its forced multi-culturalism and forced mass-immigration that cause most racial conflicts. Racial conflict doesn't really exist in peaceful natural societies. Unless another group is introduced by means of force, there is no mechanism by which a society can become multi-racial.
There's truth to this, but it's not always force besides one obvious chapter in our history.
Our on-going search for cheap labor has brought many foreigners to the United States. Anytime these foreigners or their descendants start demanding equal rights and treatment under the law is when things start getting messy.
OP, and I think I speak for everyone -- if you are going to post all sideways, you must share with all of us. Bogarting whatever substance you've taken is not nice.
OP, and I think I speak for everyone -- if you are going to post all sideways, you must share with all of us. Bogarting whatever substance you've taken is not nice.
The idea that co-mingling races ends racism is false.
That's what causes racism/conflict between cultures.
Racial hatred doesn't exist in places where there is physical distance and separation between cultures/races.
You don't have asian jokes in the US in communities with few asians, for example.
I agree. If you really want to end racism and racial/ethnic and cultural conflict, you would end diversity and multiculturalism and let different racial identities and cultures live within their own jurisdiction and borders.
Nonsense. There are already societies where the majority of people are mixed and racism still exists. It’s the mentality that must be eradicated.
When you look at Brazil for instance, it is more about segregation based on socioeconomic status, which however is still tied to skin color to a certain extent. It's no coincidence that on Brazilian soap operas mixed-race relationships are still a topic today as soap operas have a social function, making people at home aware of their prejudice in a non-personal, indirect way.
The most racist people are the white elite, the middle class and poor have no problem with mixed-race relationships. Many of them are already mixed, anyway.
That's not how that works. "White" is not a thing that gets tainted or diluted any more, or less than other races.
Of course it is. Children with one black parent and one white parent almost always are still visibly identifiable as black. Same when there is one white parent and one Asian parent. The kids are almost always visibly identifiable as Asian. The black and Asian visible identifiers only fade away when the black or Asian parent is also mostly white genetically.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
