Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
7 seconds to fully fire it.
Yes a trained person can do more.. Different triggers, resets, etc etc. We get it. Glad you searched for that video.. https://youtu.be/tqvK2dPanpA
real dumps, Under adrenaline and confusion..
And this is how liberals see it. https://youtu.be/BSizVpfqFtw
I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this idea, and of course gun nuts don't really care about the "well regulated militia" aspect, arsenals of guns in their homes satisfy their power fetish.
Just like how the OP started this is not how you get people to listen to you.
Besides you are wrong. You NEVER need a permit to peacefully assemble. This is a lie the government tells you and why I will not cede any right to them.
Thanks for the great information OP but no doubt it will be lost on the anti gun crowd if they even bother to read it.
The thing is they all want to ban the scary black guns but they don't realize that there are more powerful rifles out there. When they realize that then those too will be on the list to ban.
They won't be happy until we are reduced to shotguns and BB guns.
Of course I would rather not be shot at all but if given a choice would you rather take a round from a AR15 or a shotgun blast from a close proximity? The difference is a neat little hole or chunks of flesh being removed. When you consider a mass shooting most of the time the shooter is in close quarters with the victims. I think the damage would be far more grisly with a shotgun and more deaths would result.
MG3 means you're either not from the US or didn't serve in the US Military, the US used the 'Pig' M60 and now M240 Can't say I've fired an MG3 have fired several GPMGS though during my time with the Military. One point of note is most NATO allies don't use the M16/M4 standard issue, UK uses the SA80 (formerly the L1A1SLR) Germany the G36, Australia the F88 (Modified AUG), France FAMAS transitioning to the HK416 which while cosmetically looks like an M16/AR-15 uses short stroke gas piston, not direct impingement, so it's really an entirely different rifle. There pretty much are no NATO forces other than the US using the M16/M4 platform, nor does Israel (Tavor), nor any Scandinavian NATO by proxy, not even Saudi.
So you're wrong bucko, the M16 hasn't been anyone's choice but the US for 40 years. Which makes all the rest of your ludicrous claims equally credible. I suggest you stop now before embarrassing yourself further, but, it's probably falling on deaf ears.
Again.. your are not winning any argument. You going down the losers avenue of picking on minute details, to somehow make someone not have a valid argument.
Most SF has used Stoner variant rifles for 30 years.. and they get to choose what works best. What the general army uses is up to bean counters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir
Semi auto rifles with a box M1A, SKS/AK Clones, PS90, FN2000, SCAR-L, Sig 556, Tavor those are just the ones carried by most gun stores.
Some mass shooters may zero their sights, but, if they're proficient enough to do that, banning an AR won't achieve anything. They'll just pick a different rifle, like a Mini-14, Tavor...
So the answer is to ban all high capacity semi-automatic rifles. Agreed.
Again.. your are not winning any argument. You going down the losers avenue of picking on minute details, to somehow make someone not have a valid argument.
Most SF has used Stoner variant rifles for 30 years.. and they get to choose what works best. What the general army uses is up to bean counters.
So the answer is to ban all high capacity semi-automatic rifles. Agreed.
Columbine used 12 gauge shotguns and an intratec 9mm pistol.
Nothing high capacity about a 12 gauge shotgun...
What we are saying is, the implement will change.
You haven't addressed intent, incentive, nor motive.
So the answer is to ban all high capacity semi-automatic rifles. Agreed.
That won't stop criminals from getting them. There are tens of millions in circulation now. It will only keep the law abiding from having them. Also, it is the magazine that gives many of these rifles its Standard Capacity in which it was designed. There are even more magazines in circulation. This isn't a small country like Australia.
The answer is to stop criminals from being able to act. Law Enforcement had every opportunity to stop this guy. They failed. Address that issue.
Might as well ban all high capacity semi-automatic handguns and shotguns then also, right? That's only 97% of the arms bought in the last 60 years. Then you can ban all the bolt action that holds multiple rounds.
"Weapons or War" A favorite Hillary / Liberal term.
Hell, they're all Weapons of War. They are all as dangerous as the AR-15.
That is NOT going to happen anytime soon. We will repeat history again. Even when the "ban" was in place it did not make them illegal to sell. A person willing to kill as many people as possible do NOT care about laws or really, how they do it.
It's stupid to think they will not pick something else. The "ban" is also what caused the (R)'s make large gains. It will happen again.
No answer as to why we shouldn't concentrate on what we can do and what would be a winning platform?
You only repeat history if you do not learn from the past.
Not re-upping the ASW Ban was a mistake by the GOP.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.