Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:31 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,363,180 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The point is obvious. The .223 is very lethal, and the evidence is in the body counts.

What is YOUR point arguing it is not a lethal round, when someone just used it to kill 17 people?
They didn't argue that. The argument is it's not the most lethal and the question is why is it that it's this one that is being targeted? A .22 can be lethal.

 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,922 posts, read 26,625,686 times
Reputation: 25839
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
Thats what I have wondered about too, all this talk about AR 15s, and no one even mentions the most widely used assault weapon as well as the most mass produced...the AK47.
Yep. The 7.62 x 39mm round of the AK-47 is considered far more lethal than the 5.56. It's similar to a .30-30 Winchester.

Or in the words of NPR an "AK-15". Yep, that was on their broadcast last week.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,790,400 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
And I asked a follow up question to your statement. That is how this is supposed to work but by not answering you do answer.
Strawman arguments/questions are best left un-entertained.

No one argued there aren't other lethal rounds.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,718 posts, read 16,913,705 times
Reputation: 41865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Tell that to the victims parents.

Bingo. They can produce all the facts they want about how small an AR-15 round is, vs a cannon, but the fact still remains that 17 kids are lying dead right now , so , regardless of how weak that gun is, it sure did the job.

When you can spit out 20 rounds at a target, and only 5 hit their mark, it doesn't really much matter how small that round is, does it ? Dead is dead.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,790,400 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
They didn't argue that. The argument is it's not the most lethal and the question is why is it that it's this one that is being targeted? A .22 can be lethal.
No one argued it is the most lethal.

More straw man nonsense.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:34 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,363,180 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Strawman arguments/questions are best left un-entertained.

No one argued there aren't other lethal rounds.
O.K., so as I ask above. Why the emphasis on one that isn't even the most lethal? Aren't similar ones even as lethal? Can't handguns be as lethal? Is it really better for someone to walk the halls with a 33 round Glock?
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:34 AM
 
3,366 posts, read 1,614,808 times
Reputation: 1653
Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBeard View Post
It is a question of the caliber of the bullet, power and rapidity of the discharge that makes the difference.
What is the question? It's a 22 caliber bullet. The power? is above 1000ftlb muzzle energy and the rapidity? is around 3000fps.
I think you may be confused or incorrectly using terms.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:35 AM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,363,180 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Bingo. They can produce all the facts they want about how small an AR-15 round is, vs a cannon, but the fact still remains that 17 kids are lying dead right now , so , regardless of how weak that gun is, it sure did the job.

When you can spit out 20 rounds at a target, and only 5 hit their mark, it doesn't really much matter how small that round is, does it ? Dead is dead.
Would this not apply to other weapons also?
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,790,400 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
O.K., so as I ask above. Why the emphasis on one that isn't even the most lethal? Aren't similar ones even as lethal? Can't handguns be as lethal? Is it really better for someone to walk the halls with a 33 round Glock?
What emphasis? I have not heard anyone argue there aren't other lethal weapons.

AR-15 is the weapon of choice of the mass-killers (for whatever reason). I have not heard anyone argue they choose it because it fires .223 round.

Your problem is that you argue against points no one has made. Its a straw man game.
 
Old 02-24-2018, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,922 posts, read 26,625,686 times
Reputation: 25839
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Bingo. They can produce all the facts they want about how small an AR-15 round is, vs a cannon, but the fact still remains that 17 kids are lying dead right now , so , regardless of how weak that gun is, it sure did the job.

When you can spit out 20 rounds at a target, and only 5 hit their mark, it doesn't really much matter how small that round is, does it ? Dead is dead.
When you have "5 hit the mark" with a .223, you are probably going to have 1 killed and 4 wounded and able to be treated. You shoot 5 with a 12 gauge shotgun, you have 5 bodies. That is the point of the thread.

"Banning" AR-15s (even if you could magically eliminate them) isn't going to stop school shootings. At best, it drives the shooter to use a different firearm, in most cases one far more lethal.

School shootings won't end until we make an effort to understand...what's changed? Guns were far more readily available in the past-until 1968 anyone could order one mail order shipped to their house. Until '93 there were no background checks. Yet back then "mass shootings" were extremely rare. The guns haven't changed...people have.

Last edited by Toyman at Jewel Lake; 02-24-2018 at 07:51 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top