Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Once less robber off the streets. He is suspected in up to 10 other robberies so I am sure he was not going to stop until someone like these two ladies put an end to it. Of course some will feel sorry for poor Tyrone.
If he intended to shoot, he would ha e done so and not a damn thing mom/ daughter could have done to prevent it.
If he intended to shoot, he probably would have marched them into the back room and executed them so that his crime wouldn't be discovered while he was still in the area.
Most liquor stor owner/ operators have a gun on the premises.
He robbed the store at gun point and turned around and approached the exit.
If his intent was to kill mom and daughter he would have done so. Instead he took the cash and attempted to leave.
Mother/ daughter grabbed their guns and fired at him.
The thief was shot in the leg and turned around and wrestled/ pistol- whipped...
Mother- daughter attribute each other to saving their lives.
Their lives were not in danger because the thief was departing- until they chose to shoot.
This could have easily resulted in the death of the 2 stupid women, all for the cash drawer.
The 10 previous places he robbed most likely just handed over their cash.
The second he walked in with a shotgun and the intention to rob is when he forfeited his own safety. These two women did not want to be # 11 robbed. Dont blame them, they did what they had a right to do.
The ladies only real mistake was choosing wee sized guns for defense.
And liberals have the audacity to ask why anyone needs standard capacity magazines. He survived at least five rounds....they might have needed to shoot him 3x as many times to take him down.
They hate freedom and the idea that we all possess the right to defend our lives with any tool we wish, and that this right does NOT come from any government. It is a natural right.
Once the non-aggression principle is broken you have forfeited your rights.
Even individual cops, off the record, will tell you that if someone breaks into your house kill them. It's not worth the hassle. And cops aren't exactly purveyors of freedom.
Yep, fleeing felon rule. They did what was right.
All robbers ought to be shot on the spot anyway. We cannot have a civilized society with robbers and thieves in it. Putting them down in the midst of their aggression is always the best policy, before anyone can be harmed.
All robbers ought to be shot on the spot anyway. We cannot have a civilized society with robbers and thieves in it. Putting them down in the midst of their aggression is always the best policy, before anyone can be harmed.
It's insane we have people saying they shouldn't have locked him in.
Why?
So the next 5 stores he robs he can kill X number of people and wound y others?
We seem to have more armed robbers here than in other countries. I wonder why that is?
I don't know how accurate that is but your message is very cryptic nonetheless.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
