Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,639,854 times
Reputation: 11084

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Thats why I asked where sag got his statistic from.

2006 Federal Tax Rate Schedules (http://www.irs.gov/formspubs/article/0,,id=150856,00.html - broken link)

Clearly shows that the rich pay more taxes as a percentage of their income then the poor.
That ignores the taxes paid for BOTH Medicaid and Social Security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:36 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
That ignores the taxes paid for BOTH Medicaid and Social Security.
Read previous threads, we already discussed those issues, including the fact that the rich, dont usually collect on either one of those.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,639,854 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Read previous threads, we already discussed those issues, including the fact that the rich, dont usually collect on either one of those.
Point being, that it becomes a smaller percentage of their total tax liability, since they're also not charged over a certain level, I believe it's around $93K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:39 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
Point being, that it becomes a smaller percentage of their total tax liability, since they're also not charged over a certain level, I believe it's around $93K.
I understand that overall certain level they stop paying, thats because they usually stop collecting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,639,854 times
Reputation: 11084
Thus, they pay a SMALLER percentage of their incomes in tax over someone who DOES pay it. Progressively smaller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:26 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
Thus, they pay a SMALLER percentage of their incomes in tax over someone who DOES pay it. Progressively smaller.
No, not it doesnt.. because they still pay a higher income tax. Unless your going to argue that the SS tax is over 5%-7%.. which it isnt.. (difference between what someone poorer pays in income taxes (28%), vs someone richer (33%-35%))
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:28 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I understand that overall certain level they stop paying, thats because they usually stop collecting.
Taxes and benefits have nothing to do with each other in this context. In 2008, those in covered positions will see SS payroll taxes deducted on the first $102,000 of covered income. There is no cap for the Medicare tax.

Meanwhile, in 2005 (the most recent year for which detail are available), some 148,000 tax filers with AGI above $500K collected approximately $3.4 billion worth of Social Security benefits...an average of a little over $23K apiece.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,639,854 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
No, not it doesnt.. because they still pay a higher income tax. Unless your going to argue that the SS tax is over 5%-7%.. which it isnt.. (difference between what someone poorer pays in income taxes (28%), vs someone richer (33%-35%))
The Social Security tax is approximately 15% of your income. If you're self-employed, that's what you pay, because your employer...well, actually your employer IS paying the other half, since you're your own employer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:41 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,464,947 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
No, not it doesnt.. because they still pay a higher income tax. Unless your going to argue that the SS tax is over 5%-7%.. which it isnt.. (difference between what someone poorer pays in income taxes (28%), vs someone richer (33%-35%))
CBO: Effective tax burden, Social Insurance Taxes, 2005...

Poorest 20% ... 8.3%
Next Poorest ... 9.2%
Middle 20% ... 9.5%
Next Richest ... 9.7%
Richest 20% ... 6.0%

Top 10% ... 4.8%
Top 5% ... 3.5%
Top 1% ... 1.7%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:55 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
Taxes and benefits have nothing to do with each other in this context. In 2008, those in covered positions will see SS payroll taxes deducted on the first $102,000 of covered income. There is no cap for the Medicare tax.

Meanwhile, in 2005 (the most recent year for which detail are available), some 148,000 tax filers with AGI above $500K collected approximately $3.4 billion worth of Social Security benefits...an average of a little over $23K apiece.
So let me get my math straight.. per your limits and 2008 Social Security Changes: Press Office as a tax rate example

1) The rich pay 12.4% to the limit of $102,000 = $12,648 taxes paid
2) The rich pay 2.9% on all income (lets assume $500K per your example) = $14,500, so each individual who makes over $500,000 pays at least $27,148 a year
3) $27,148 * 148,000 people over $500,000 income = $4,017,904,000 paid into Social Security

According to this math, the rich pay $4,017,904,000 into social security and collect $3,400,000,000 out, meaning the rich people pay over $617,904,000 extra into Social Security, and they are being greedy?

Note, this total is even more then that because some people make over $500,000 a year, and pay 2.9% of their income in addition to the total above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top