Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-03-2018, 08:30 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,393,887 times
Reputation: 4812

Advertisements

That's a hilariously staffed panel in Portland. It was like rolling a powder keg into a barn fire

And, predictably, it exploded for more bad press for the Left.

The entire West Coast, but especially the Northern portion, is getting an increasingly bad rep for extremism. Already this year, a least two major Bay Area personalities are moving away explicitly because of the stifling political climate.

This isn't going to turn around for the Left nor the nation as a whole until they reign it in a touch. Living in civilization is about rational compromise, not Utopian visions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2018, 03:32 AM
 
Location: Great Britain
27,132 posts, read 13,424,152 times
Reputation: 19426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
What the guy in the video is advocating is pretty much what the law is here in the US, where we do have laws against threats resulting in imminent danger, and that sort of thing.

However, we also have "No platforming" at many of our universities and online, which is eagerly implemented and supported by members of the Democrat left, who apparently have come to believe that free speech rights are inviolable for them and those whose opinions comply with the Democrat left's "Political correctness" thought and speech codes, but that non-conforming speech by their political adversaries is "hate speech".

The term "hate speech" here in the USA, as used by these same people, has increasingly come to mean any speech which is in conflict with these far left's "Political correctness" thought and speech codes, which must not be tolerated or given a platform, if they have the strength to impose those restrictions.

Also, as you have seen here in this thread, the absurd idea that if someone is "offended" or "distressed," that also provides leftists with all the justification they think they need to fire people from their jobs, ban them from social media, ruin or shut down their businesses, harass these people at their homes, etc., or just expect them to shut up and submit to personal preferences of the person who claims to be offended.

We are not talking about the possibility of these things happening in the USA. These things ARE happening in the USA and members of the illiberal Democrat left are the authors and ringleaders of these attitudes and these actions. I hope I do not have to tell you that this is not acceptable and that these sorts of attitudes and expectations must be rejected, attacked and pushed back against - hard.
The guy in the video is advocating free speech only to the extent that people are not hounded or their human rights denied. However Laws already existed in relation to malicious or obscene phone calls and were merely extended to the internet, and laws relating to harassment, assault, intimidation, and obscenity, both in the US and UK. There is also legislation in relation to Sexual Harassment and the harassment of people due to numerous other criteria including disability, sexuality, ethnicity etc.

Speech is not free when you threaten violence or issue a credible threat, nor is harrassment, intimadation or extreme obscenity such as revenge porn.

However I do believe in the right to insult, and a mere insult should not be a crime. I also don't agree with 'no platforming' and related nonsense which stifles free debate.

Section 5 of the Public Order Act originally used the word insulting but this was thankfully ammended in 2013 after a long campaign, which was backed by a number of high-profile activists including comedian Rowan Atkinson and former Shadow Home Secretary David Davis.

'Insulting' to be dropped from section 5 of Public Order Act | Guardian

'Insulting words' crime ditched - BBC News



Last edited by Brave New World; 03-04-2018 at 04:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2018, 06:46 AM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,934,145 times
Reputation: 18149
Quote:
Originally Posted by T0103E View Post
People often misunderstand the purpose of freedom of speech. It's about being able to speak your mind without punishment. Not being fined or jailed for holding an unpopular opinion.

That always seems to get conflated with things like actual violent threats. It's frustrating when people can't distinguish the two.
Exactly:

If someone calls you a name you don't like, you are OFFENDED.

If someone swings a 2 by 4 at your head, you are THREATENED.

People need to UNDERSTAND the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2018, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Chicago area
18,757 posts, read 11,786,210 times
Reputation: 64151
The Daily Wire: " An American conservative news and OPINION website.

These troll threads always have this tedious one size fits all hyperbolic weak spin. Boring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2018, 10:03 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,512,122 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
The guy in the video is advocating free speech only to the extent that people are not hounded or their human rights denied. However Laws already existed in relation to malicious or obscene phone calls and were merely extended to the internet, and laws relating to harassment, assault, intimidation, and obscenity, both in the US and UK. There is also legislation in relation to Sexual Harassment and the harassment of people due to numerous other criteria including disability, sexuality, ethnicity etc.

Speech is not free when you threaten violence or issue a credible threat, nor is harrassment, intimadation or extreme obscenity such as revenge porn.

However I do believe in the right to insult, and a mere insult should not be a crime. I also don't agree with 'no platforming' and related nonsense which stifles free debate.

Section 5 of the Public Order Act originally used the word insulting but this was thankfully ammended in 2013 after a long campaign, which was backed by a number of high-profile activists including comedian Rowan Atkinson and former Shadow Home Secretary David Davis.

'Insulting' to be dropped from section 5 of Public Order Act | Guardian

'Insulting words' crime ditched - BBC News


Good post.

However, it is disturbing to me and I think it should be disturbing to you that the law in the UK ever specifically prohibited insults (at least insults to leftists, because we both know that it was never meant to defend rightists from being insulted), or that there was any reluctance or pushback against correcting that error. This is real Orwellian type stuff that we are witnessing here, and it is being pushed and promoted by the left, for the benefit ONLY of the left.

The fact that anyone could be arrested in the UK effectively for proclaiming quotes from Winston Churchill - even one time - should chill you to the bone. This was no accident and there are a LOT of people both in your country and ours who whole-heartedly support this kind of suppression of speech which does not conform to their specific preferences. These are common tactics by fascists, communists, and totalitarian bullies.... but I repeat myself.

I hope you will agree that this kind of stuff cannot be accommodated or tolerated by any people who wish to remain free in any meaningful sense of the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top