Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I love the defense that tech companies have high turnover too. Its insanely deceptive. Tech companies hire a ton of temp workers. The whitehouse isn't. Its a apples to banana comparison.
That's what he gets for picking his own staff. Hillary hand picked Obama's staff and while it was the most cognitively challenged White House in US history, turnover rate was low except for a few cretins that had to be denied. ( Van Jones)
Trump said, "I alone can fix it." With this level of staff turnover, he might have to soon. Who will replace the people who resigned or were fired? Or will Trump leave the seats empty and rely on his own instincts?
Temp workers, by definition, are not counted as part of turnover.
Actually it depends. They are counted if they are hired as temps by the company, or as temp to hires.
Nevertheless, people at this level of government are not identical cogs easily replaced. Turnover of these rates is insane. I've worked at tech-only at a very very few have turnover rates this high. Amazon comes to mind as being one. But Intel by contrast has a average employment length of 3 years.
Its ludicrous trying to defend this high of a turnover rate in the whitehouse.
I can't think of m/any successful enterprises that have a 43% turnover rate.
So what? America's winning again now, that's all that matters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.