Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2018, 11:56 AM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 1 day ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,599,675 times
Reputation: 5697

Advertisements

Communism and socialism are economic systems, not political ones. To communism’s founder Karl Marx, history is about the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, while economics is about the middle class (bourgeoise) and nobility exploiting the working class, namely by paying the worker less for his or her labor than the actual value of goods and services the worker produced, in effect stealing part of the workers’ labors and paying them just enough to survive. Marx’s solution was to abolish all private ownership of property and have the workers own the means of production (farms, mines, forests, factories, transport lines, and any item that can produce wealth for the owner). In short, communism centers on who owns the means of production.

Laws regulating property privately is not of who owns the land. It’s a matter of regulating human behavior, more of a public policy matter than an economic one. Therefore, communism does not cover such matters. Nor does it cover taxes, what we pay in order to maintain a police force, legal system, and military in order to protect society from threats to it (invading armies and criminals). It also includes funding public goods that the private sector could never hope to accomplish well on its own, if at all (roads, bridges, dams, rural electrification, etc.).

Again, this is not a question of who owns what, at least outside the geographic range of the project (the government could always declare imminent domain over a property IF the owner is justly compensated). It is a question of our individual obligations to society (promote mutual security, mutual obligations to help fund projects which neither individuals, nor the private sector could ever develop on their own, but yet are considered vital for even minimal functioning of all members of a society).

In short, once the question shifts from outright ownership of wealth-creating properties and to our obligations to fund police, military, and mutually helping each other fund needed projects beyond the ability of the private sector to do so, it’s not about communism any more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:00 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,649,302 times
Reputation: 13053
All kinds of shade. Triggers the left who stand in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:12 PM
Status: "Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge." (set 1 day ago)
 
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,599,675 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
All kinds of shade. Triggers the left who stand in it.
Specifics, or are you just content to think that short simple jabs are enough to disprove what I say?

You'd think that people with so much hysteria about communism would at least have an idea of what it means. But I guess there are some people who think short catchy phrases can disprove anything (does that include the US Constitution as well? It's a longwinded document, yet certain "patriotic" types would go ape if someone dismissed it with some short clever jab.

The US Constitution, a long-winded false justification for acting like a wild animal in the wilderness, that is, freedom
.

See my point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:16 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,739 posts, read 7,606,770 times
Reputation: 15005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil75230 View Post
Communism and socialism are economic systems, not political ones.
Gotta love it. He looks at a system that eliminates the basic concept of private property, and in the same breath claims it's not a political system.

Is there any limit to the bizarre twists a liberal will go through to try to take stuff away from others?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:26 PM
 
23,974 posts, read 15,078,314 times
Reputation: 12952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil75230 View Post
Communism and socialism are economic systems, not political ones. To communism’s founder Karl Marx, history is about the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, while economics is about the middle class (bourgeoise) and nobility exploiting the working class, namely by paying the worker less for his or her labor than the actual value of goods and services the worker produced, in effect stealing part of the workers’ labors and paying them just enough to survive. Marx’s solution was to abolish all private ownership of property and have the workers own the means of production (farms, mines, forests, factories, transport lines, and any item that can produce wealth for the owner). In short, communism centers on who owns the means of production.

Laws regulating property privately is not of who owns the land. It’s a matter of regulating human behavior, more of a public policy matter than an economic one. Therefore, communism does not cover such matters. Nor does it cover taxes, what we pay in order to maintain a police force, legal system, and military in order to protect society from threats to it (invading armies and criminals). It also includes funding public goods that the private sector could never hope to accomplish well on its own, if at all (roads, bridges, dams, rural electrification, etc.).

Again, this is not a question of who owns what, at least outside the geographic range of the project (the government could always declare imminent domain over a property IF the owner is justly compensated). It is a question of our individual obligations to society (promote mutual security, mutual obligations to help fund projects which neither individuals, nor the private sector could ever develop on their own, but yet are considered vital for even minimal functioning of all members of a society).

In short, once the question shifts from outright ownership of wealth-creating properties and to our obligations to fund police, military, and mutually helping each other fund needed projects beyond the ability of the private sector to do so, it’s not about communism any more.
You are casting pearls.

Half here will not get what you are saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,521,305 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post

Half here will not get what you are saying.
Indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,174 posts, read 19,200,869 times
Reputation: 14898
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
All kinds of shade. Triggers the left who stand in it.
it would add a lot more to the discussion if you would let us know what it is you disagree with about the definitions given. Your opinion without any support lacks all substance. Just sayin'...

Last edited by cuebald; 03-18-2018 at 01:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,360,513 times
Reputation: 14459
Are hundreds of millions of people enslaved and killed under this definition of communism too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Heart of the desert lands
3,976 posts, read 1,990,544 times
Reputation: 5219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil75230 View Post
Communism and socialism are economic systems, not political ones.

Economic systems are inherently political.

Why did George Orwell, a democratic socialist, write a critique on communism in his Animal Farm?

Simply because he didnt like the economic aspects of communism?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2018, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Heart of the desert lands
3,976 posts, read 1,990,544 times
Reputation: 5219
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Are hundreds of millions of people enslaved and killed under this definition of communism too?
Perhaps it was done for an "economical" reason.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top