Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you support companies being sued for content that users post on their site?
Yes, they are just as responsible! 0 0%
No, How can a company be responsible for the actions of a user un-afilliated with the company? 5 100.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2017, 10:41 AM
 
7,736 posts, read 4,990,052 times
Reputation: 7963

Advertisements

NO ORIGIN STORY of the internet would be complete without mentioning one of its legal pillars: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a 21-year-old law that shields tech companies from liability for content posted by users. Silicon Valley has long argued that any change to the law would hamper free speech and destroy the internet as we know it. Now, outrage over sex trafficking, mixed with growing unease about Silicon Valley’s economic and political clout, may be pushing tech companies to loosen their grip on the shield.
The change emerged during a packed Senate hearing on Tuesday to debate The Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act (SESTA), which would amend Section 230 to create liability for internet companies that knowingly facilitate trafficking on their platforms.



It all boils down to this woman. She is trying to get the law changed because of her daughter who was killed. She obviously was not watching her kid on the internet and now wants to sue companies because of her lousy parenting......




https://www.wired.com/story/tech-fir...x-trafficking/

Last edited by Jimmyp25; 09-20-2017 at 10:43 AM.. Reason: mispelling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2017, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,529,813 times
Reputation: 5182
I can see a case ONLY if all content requires prior approval, like the comments and review sections of some businesses. But something like Google/YouTube, or CityData which are by nature reactive, no!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2018, 11:19 AM
 
Location: los angeles county
1,763 posts, read 2,047,727 times
Reputation: 1877
This bill is too broad. They are overreaching into the sex lives of legit untrafficked adults.
While it tries to stop sex trafficking, it also blocks consenting adults who just want to F.

Craigslist just shut down its personals section, preventing many legit users from posting.
Now they have to resort to Tinder.
What's next? Will the dating apps shutdown too?

Dumb sheep running the government
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top