Anyone Here Planning To Attend DC Anti-gun March And Counterprotest? (Marines, dollars)

[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by gmagoo

In the 80`s and the 70`s people weren`t as weary of this madness as they are now. The focus is now on schools but what about the church shoot-ups, concerts, movie theaters, etc.? We shouldn`t be normalizing this form of terrorism

We defend our military bases and police stations with armed personnel, and there never has been a mass shooting (at armed personnel).

How about putting more armed security in churches, concerts, schools, movie theaters, etc? Most of them are gun-free zones.

And when there's an active shooter on the loose, someone has to call someone with a gun (the police) to stop them.

[ipaper]

Originally Posted by odanny

Oh look, a thread about these kids speaking out in Washington D.C. was moved into a pro-gun counter protest thread.

Makes sense.

I know, right?

[trobesmom]

Originally Posted by scgraham

Well, you're getting the Holy Book anyway. It will be thumping in your head as the endless ages roll on while your in hell.

Wow, Christianity sure hasn't taught you anything about love, has it? Nice.

[take57]

Originally Posted by Cruithne

Thr march today is called March for our Lives.

It is a March for sensible gun legislation.

Why are all the threads about the march being merged into a thread about a counterprotest?

Convenient burial.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by CraigCreek

Apples and oranges, whataboutery, absurd comparison. Guns are tangible, free speech is not. Come on, there are valid points that your side can make, but this is certainly not one of them.

It absolutely is a valid point. Can we require a license to express free speech and to vote, both of which are also Constitutional Rights? Why or why not?

[trobesmom]

Originally Posted by Kevroqs

We defend our military bases and police stations with armed personnel, and there never has been a mass shooting (at armed personnel).

I beg to differ. Fort Hood comes to mind.

[rebeldor]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

Have they at least tried filling potholes with the bodies of dead babies from Damascus, Fallujah, and Kabul?

I know we have to kill those babies, apparently, but what about shipping the corpses to fill the potholes and possibly saving us money?

We need our roads too ya know.

It'd be cheaper, that's for sure.

These peoples' taxes are buying machine guns, tanks, drones, fighter jets, aircraft carriers--you name it--all in the name of mass murder.

Yet they support people who want to march to give away their rights.

[Kevroqs]

Originally Posted by trobesmom

I beg to differ. Fort Hood comes to mind.

The victims of the Fort Hood shooting were unarmed

[trobesmom]

Originally Posted by Hrw-500

I'm afraid David Hogg might push the envelope further being more agressive then his mighty and raging fury* inside him will blow up and going out of control.

(* I taked this found from the title card of the live-action Incredible Hulk pilot tv episode:""Within each of us, ofttimes, dwells a mighty and raging fury" and that quote might fit David Hogg like a glove)

You're so kind to be worried about David Hogg. I love all these arm chair psychiatrists, diagnosing these kids, lol.

[hawaiiancoconut]

Originally Posted by trobesmom

Don't worry. No one is going to take your guns. You can relax.

That's just the reality of this entire gun debate when its all said and done - nobody is banning or coming for any guns that is legally own today, including AR15's.