Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2018, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
No, navy seals use many weapons, not all are fully auto.
they use MILITARY ISSUE weapons...of which the ar15 is NOT

 
Old 03-27-2018, 03:49 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,727,592 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
they use MILITARY ISSUE weapons...of which the ar15 is NOT
So what? How does that prove a lever action rifle is equivalent to an ar15?
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
So what? How does that prove a lever action rifle is equivalent to an ar15?
ever see "the rifleman"


I can fire my lever-action just as fast as an ar15...its still one round per trigger squeeze
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:01 PM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,420,628 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by dothetwist View Post
The desperation among the few remaining trumpers is quite palpable.
That's the only statement needed. End of story!
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:01 PM
 
6,617 posts, read 5,008,211 times
Reputation: 3689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Hillary would say we don't need "Weapons of War".

Hell, they're almost all weapons of war.
You win a price for somehow working in Hillary.
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:28 PM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,699,096 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
I already had which is WHY I used it.

"Charges for crimes involving firearms have increased dramatically across the island nation’s localities in the past decade according to an analysis of government statistics conducted by The New Daily. It found that gun crimes have spiked dramatically in the Australian states of Victoria, New South Wales, South Australia, and Tasmania. In Victoria, pistol-related offenses doubled over the last decade. In New South Wales, they tripled. The other states saw smaller but still significant increases. Experts said that the country’s 1996 ban on most semi-automatic firearms has actually driven criminals to those guns. “The ban on semi-automatics created demand by criminals for other types of guns,” professor Philip Alpers of the University of Sydney told The New Daily. “The criminal’s gun of choice today is the semi-automatic pistol.”
[…]Regardless of the reasons for the jump in gun crime, the numbers reveal the true size of Australia’s illegal gun market. “Taken together, the data suggests that despite our tough anti-gun laws, thousands of weapons are either being stolen or entering the country illegally,The New Daily said. “The fourfold rise in handgun-related charges in NSW in the past decade points to the existence of a big illegal market for concealable firearms that seems to have been underestimated in the past.”
If you take guns away from law-abiding people (which is what Australia did), then only criminals will have guns. And that means that the criminals will become bolder in the face of their disarmed victims.

https://winteryknight.com/2017/10/06...icide-rates-2/

As hs been stated thousands if times if you ban something people will STILL get it.


Just look at the War on Drugs and the War on Poverty.



Did the amendment to the Constitution banning alcohol STOP people from drinking?


If you stop LEGAL possession ILLEGAL possessions INCREASE.


With guns, especially semi's, are banned the BAD GUYS WILL STILL GET THEM AND YOU CAN'T!
Yeah, I"m sure a whole lot of people rushed right out to get poverty once it was 'banned'. duh.
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:31 PM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,699,096 times
Reputation: 3174
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81 View Post
Half of Democrats want All guns banned.....because half the Democrats can't own weapons themselves: (ex-cons convicted of one or more felonies, have a record of being mentally unstable - including but not limited to suicidal, have an order of protection against them, etc.). They can't legally own weapons or have them in their possession, so they don't want anyone else to either. Just think of how easy it would be for Joe Blow the ragman to hold up another gas station or break into someone's house who they want to rape if they know that no one will try and stop them with the use of a firearm.
Provide some stats to back up your allegations. Otherwise, it can be considered, y'know... just your opinion.
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:35 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
So what? How does that prove a lever action rifle is equivalent to an ar15?

Well, meet my little friend.
Bought with my own money from the Sears & Robuck Catalog when I was 9 yo. Shipped to my door by the mailman, with a box of cartridges.

Loved the background check!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Half of Democrats want ALL guns banned-my-rifleman.jpg  
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:42 PM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,836,796 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"We fully support the Second Amendment, but nobody who isn't a soldier fighting a war needs a semi-automatic weapon."

A TOTAL CONTRADICTION.

"needs a semi-automatic weapon."" Says YOU.

If you don't want one, don't get one.

Do you even KNOW waht one is?

"The RIGHT of the PEOPLE to KEEP and Bear arms shall NOT BE INFRINGED"

Just for grins, what do you think "infringed" means?

And did you KNOW that Thomas Jefferson GAVE SEMI-AUTOMATICS to Lewis & Clark for the expedition?

So, don't come back with "they were not around at the time"

No, he didn't. Meriwether Lewis bought one in 1803 that had been abandoned by the Austrian army as impractical because it was an air rifle requiring compressed, not even really a firearm. Note the date is twelve years after the Bill of Rights was enacted.
 
Old 03-27-2018, 04:52 PM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,836,796 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC76-81 View Post
Half of Democrats want All guns banned.....because half the Democrats can't own weapons themselves: (ex-cons convicted of one or more felonies, have a record of being mentally unstable - including but not limited to suicidal, have an order of protection against them, etc.). They can't legally own weapons or have them in their possession, so they don't want anyone else to either. Just think of how easy it would be for Joe Blow the ragman to hold up another gas station or break into someone's house who they want to rape if they know that no one will try and stop them with the use of a firearm.

You made that up. It's not true. Fake, phony news. Your whole post is a lie.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top