Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2018, 10:00 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
7,444 posts, read 7,016,699 times
Reputation: 4601

Advertisements

https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...t-10-20161.jpg

it's very curious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-26-2018, 12:08 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,739 posts, read 7,606,770 times
Reputation: 15006
Umm... the FBI is about to get caught trying to use its official power to sabotage a candidate in the 2016 election?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 12:48 AM
 
12,039 posts, read 6,570,692 times
Reputation: 13981
And who are Jim, Trisha, David and Mike?
And why does their potential talking amongst themselves stir up such concern?
Are they part of the secret group Strzok alluded to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 12:48 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,397,248 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUTGR View Post
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.

Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.

In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 12:52 PM
 
267 posts, read 122,061 times
Reputation: 106
Yeah probably some evil script.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 02:00 PM
 
Location: St Paul
7,713 posts, read 4,747,999 times
Reputation: 5007
Thanks for posting. This is a great site and of course it brings up a point the left desperately wants to avoid talking about.

Strzok & the rest of this group of FBI co-conspirators have all been demoted, fired or retired the day after this text became public. That should tell you all you need to know about the validity of the concern.

It's pretty clear, Strzok & the co-conspirators intentionally withheld the 302's (FBI case notes) that would have been "inflammatory", but never fear, as he said in the text, they will come out and it will be very bad for the FBI.

You may have noticed that shortly after this text became public the new judge in the Michael Flynn case ordered ALL exculpatory evidence to be submitted to the defense in his case, even though the plea had already been entered. i.e. The judge knew damn well the FBI had witheld evidence that would have helped clear him of any crimes. i.e. The 302's, the FBI case notes showed they believed Flynn was not guilty of lying to them and went after him for it anyway, because it was a witch hunt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 4,094,955 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUTGR View Post
Without full context, your question is pointless. Anyone answering this question either has information we do not or (more likely) is just making **** up becasue it sounds nice in their head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 02:07 PM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,566 posts, read 10,617,630 times
Reputation: 9247
The only thing I got out of that text is that it is out of context.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 02:40 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.

Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.

In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.
Same thing, from Twitter:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUb9DSZVoAABcqg.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2018, 02:45 PM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,597,200 times
Reputation: 2398
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.

Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.

In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.

do you go outside without a helmet? perhaps you should consider one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top