Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And who are Jim, Trisha, David and Mike?
And why does their potential talking amongst themselves stir up such concern?
Are they part of the secret group Strzok alluded to?
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.
Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.
In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.
Thanks for posting. This is a great site and of course it brings up a point the left desperately wants to avoid talking about.
Strzok & the rest of this group of FBI co-conspirators have all been demoted, fired or retired the day after this text became public. That should tell you all you need to know about the validity of the concern.
It's pretty clear, Strzok & the co-conspirators intentionally withheld the 302's (FBI case notes) that would have been "inflammatory", but never fear, as he said in the text, they will come out and it will be very bad for the FBI.
You may have noticed that shortly after this text became public the new judge in the Michael Flynn case ordered ALL exculpatory evidence to be submitted to the defense in his case, even though the plea had already been entered. i.e. The judge knew damn well the FBI had witheld evidence that would have helped clear him of any crimes. i.e. The 302's, the FBI case notes showed they believed Flynn was not guilty of lying to them and went after him for it anyway, because it was a witch hunt.
Without full context, your question is pointless. Anyone answering this question either has information we do not or (more likely) is just making **** up becasue it sounds nice in their head.
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.
Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.
In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.
Requiring a click on an image, on a public forum, to participate in a thread is an absolute non-starter. You need to describe the image and the discussion that you wish to have, or embed it in the post, or not post at all.
Images download locally when you click on them, and are easy shells for viruses as well as illegal imagery either embedded in the image file itself or as a part of the image itself. Its impossible to know if he image that you are demanding that we click on has an illegal image on it before we would click on it.
In sum, posting a link to an image on a public forum, at all, is bad form.
do you go outside without a helmet? perhaps you should consider one
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.