Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh really? Just give it a second or two; there'll be another shooting event and another Hogg to champion a cause for change.................it's as inevitable as Trump lying while whining.
You are not hearing much about Cruz, either.
You would not believe me if I told you why.
Hoggwash and the fab 4, were used and abused to get people to surrender their rights, on a false narrative.
The truth has been exposed, what this was. The cover up in the Sheriff's dept.... Follow the money. Always follow the money, not what the right or left hand is doing. That is just the theater.
Yet the students, union activists, and government schools were allowed to speak about taking Constitutional Rights away from the law abiding.
They don't go to a shooting range to talk about gun control. Don't take your pro-gun speeches to a place where youth witnessed the slaughter of their classmates and friends from gunfire just 2 months ago.
Seriously, the gun rights people need to use some common sense.
They don't go to a shooting range to talk about gun control. Don't take your pro-gun speeches to a place where youth witnessed the slaughter of their classmates and friends from gunfire just 2 months ago.
Seriously, the gun nuts need to use some common sense.
Yes, God forbid someone goes to a school and teaches kids to respect out civil rights.
Where do you stand on the Right to Life spectrum? Just curious.
That is how I talk about people that are so ignorant and naive, they get exploited, for a use and discarded.
High school students with enough balls to bully me, will be met with much friction, to point out their immaturity and lack of rational reasoning.
They don't go to a shooting range to talk about gun control. Don't take your pro-gun speeches to a place where youth witnessed the slaughter of their classmates and friends from gunfire just 2 months ago.
Seriously, the gun nuts need to use some common sense.
The fact is millennial's are the biggest voting block since the baby boomers and they are organized with a cause. We should be proud of these young people's dedication instead of putting them down and making fun of them. Just remember these kids may or may not take care of you in your old age.
The students who organized and protested are not Millennials. They're post-Millennials aka iGeneration or Generation Z.
They don't go to a shooting range to talk about gun control. Don't take your pro-gun speeches to a place where youth witnessed the slaughter of their classmates and friends from gunfire just 2 months ago.
Seriously, the gun nuts need to use some common sense.
The school is exactly where this conversation needs to take place. It is evident from the student protests that the kids aren't being taught about the Constitution by their teachers, so someone needs to fill them in.
They don't go to a shooting range to talk about gun control. Don't take your pro-gun speeches to a place where youth witnessed the slaughter of their classmates and friends from gunfire just 2 months ago.
Seriously, the gun nuts need to use some common sense.
Does the public sector own the gun ranges, and pay for them? Last time I checked schools are public places, and I pay for them, so I am free to protest there if I want. I can think of no better place than that to be PRO CONSTITUTION, and PRO citizen's RIGHTS.
Calling me a "gun nut" just makes you look like an idiot.
Same with Planned Parenthood who some/many would argue are directly involved in killing but I don't see you advocating their demise...... I Wonder why?
Cell clusters are not human beings any more than warts. Analogy fail.
If you really want to get serious, why aren't you trying to shut down fertility clinics where millions of eggs are fertilized every year and the zygotes dumped down the sink...?
Also, you are, of course, in favor of every child already born being fed, clothed, housed, educated, and supplied with medical care whether or not their parents are able to provide it, at taxpayer expense if necessary, yes...?
If his sole reason for rejecting the nominee was skin color and there were no other factors, yes, that would not make sense and I would not support it.
If his reason was that he was concerned that the court wasn't diverse enough, it's not about skin color, it's about diversity. It's about having a court that is made up of people who more closely represent the demographics of the country they represent.
So... what was it?
To even suggest it....
He gets the double standard pass!
This is just disgusting, anyone would justify that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
