Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And, of course, no liberal would ever be
guilty of a personal attack.
Open a can of worms, lately?
This is why I don't have a problem with those who
engage in personal attack against the domestic
enemies of our Constitution.
If you took this personally that is your problem. I cannot recall directing it towards you. OMG the paranoia... But if the shoe fits...by all means...
And btw, it was an activist judge that mangled the 2nd amendment. These kids that survived a school massacre know way more about The Constitution that you do.
And, of course, no liberal would ever be
guilty of a personal attack.
Open a can of worms, lately?
This is why I don't have a problem with those who
engage in personal attack against the domestic
enemies of our Constitution.
A couple of posts back you were saying that SCOTUS is not the final arbiter, but they are the ones who hear cases and interpret the Consitution. Now you are against "domestic enemies of our Constitution".
I'm confused. Are you in favor of defending the Constitution, in which case you recognize the authority of SCOTUS, or are you a scofflaw? Your statements are mutually contradictory.
and i been dropping her advertiser because they drop her, and i dont even care for her. it the reason that somebody can blackmail someone just because they disagree with the topic, pretty soon, nobody going to upset any liberal because they know they get kick off and cancel. Im not talking freedom of speech, which this is not.
The government has not limited anyone's Freedom of Speech, and that is the only way 1A could have been violated. Individuals cannot violate 1A.
What I am seeing from these young men and women is so much like what we saw in the late 60's, when kids started questioning some of the stupidity that adults were thrusting on them, like the Vietnam war.
Spotted a story on Yahoo about Camera Hogg calling for a boycott of Laura Ingraham's advertisers because she called him names.
You know what I found funny...Laura Ingraham has meet her match with these kids. She thought she could bully him and he would just lie down and take it. How wrong was she when how many advertisers left her...8, 10? And still counting. A grown women does not bully a kid who has gone through probably the most horrific experience of his life without backlash. And now we have her lame apology to him because she is losing advertisers She's the one crying right now
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But if the shoe fits...by all means...
