Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Pruitt spends like a drunken sailor. First class tickets? Why does he think he’s so special? I thought the Republicans were crying about a balanced budget when Obama was in office? Well don’t complain when the Democrats spend money when they get in.....
Pruitt spends like a drunken sailor. First class tickets? Why does he think he’s so special? I thought the Republicans were crying about a balanced budget when Obama was in office? Well don’t complain when the Democrats spend money when they get in.....
Dare to dream.
When the pendulum swings and Democrats are in control, Republicans will wring their hands and carry on about the awful debt and how something needs to be done.
Why in heaven's name would Republicans want to get rid of Pruitt? He's their poster boy -- undermine environmental regulations, shill for corporate interests, spend like a drunken sailor.
Sadly, in the Trump swamp, I'm sure this will be just yet another entry on the very long list of why criminally corrupt Pruitt should be on his way to jail. But the presumed keeper of the pee tape or some other equally ignominious information will continue to hang on like the cockroach that he is.
Right. Oklahoma wants him back for that reason, and also so he can run for State Corporation Commissioner, take campaign money from corporations, especially oil companies, he will regulate and do favors for them after he wins.
Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 05-01-2018 at 07:39 PM..
I think Trump will be better off without him, too. Like Tillerman, Pruitt's choice was a bad mistake that came from Trump and his team's inexperience.
Since Pompeo has done so well so soon after replacing Tillerman, I think Trump is now more aware that there are better people out there for the EPA than Pruitt for both the job and for Trump.
I think Trump will be better off without him, too. Like Tillerman, Pruitt's choice was a bad mistake that came from Trump and his team's inexperience.
Since Pompeo has done so well so soon after replacing Tillerman, I think Trump is now more aware that there are better people out there for the EPA than Pruitt for both the job and for Trump.
But who could Trump get to replace Pruitt that is as committed as he is to setting back environmental regulations 100 years. Maybe they could bring James G. Watt back from the dead. Anyone remember him?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
