Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2018, 06:08 AM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,011,664 times
Reputation: 10411

Advertisements

I agree that Mr. Mueller's investigation will end 'soon'.


Of course, the word 'soon' is elastic, at least according to President Trump.


For instance, in January 2017, Mr. Trump said concerning releasing his income tax form:


“I’m under a routine audit and it'll be released, and as soon as the audit is finished it will be released."


Just this week, Mr. Trump referred to our troops leaving Syria 'soon, very soon'.


So, yes, it is safe to proclaim 'soon'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2018, 06:17 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,508,677 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
When it started and when it ends makes no difference. It is what evidence is uncovered that will tell the tale.
People who refuse to accept the fact that the investigation began in July 2016 apparently don't agree with you that when it started doesn't matter. If when it ends doesn't matter, why not have a Permanent Special Counsel to investigate forever.


Besides, politically the objective was to get rid of Trump. The longer it takes, hope he'll be removed remains, but the joy and celebration isn't fulfilled. Nor can the remove Pence campaign begin.

At some point, the likelihood of getting Trump on conspiracy charges becomes lower. 2 years, 3, 5 ? Mueller might eventually get him for something --- illegal business transactions, ties to the mob, a Linda Tripp, Lewinsky, Jones fiasco.

Last edited by jazzarama; 04-05-2018 at 06:44 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 07:10 AM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,087,126 times
Reputation: 7852
We can sit here and speculate until the cows come home.

None of us on City-Data know what Mueller has on the POTUS, and we won't know until the investigation is over and the facts are revealed.

Until then, I wish MSM would give it a rest already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,222 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14914
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
People who refuse to accept the fact that the investigation began in July 2016 apparently don't agree with you that when it started doesn't matter. If when it ends doesn't matter, why not have a Permanent Special Counsel to investigate forever.


Besides, politically the objective was to get rid of Trump. The longer it takes, hope he'll be removed remains, but the joy and celebration isn't fulfilled. Nor can the remove Pence campaign begin.

At some point, the likelihood of getting Trump on conspiracy charges becomes lower. 2 years, 3, 5 ? Mueller might eventually get him for something --- illegal business transactions, ties to the mob, a Linda Tripp, Lewinsky, Jones fiasco.
I have some problem with this seeing that Mueller, Rosenstein, and Trump are all republicans. If the FBI inquiry had had no merit according to DOJ, Mueller would never have been appointed. He was appointed because of Trump's firing of Comey, the FBI investigation that Trump was trying to stop, and Trump's public remarks to visiting Russians about Comey's firing. In other words, Trump brought this investigation on himself.

As to how long - Special Prosecutors do not operate on a schedule. What they do is not production work. The average investigation runs 904 days, and some have gone on six or seven years. This one is particularly complex. The results we have seen this early are stunning - 22 indicted, five charged, three cooperating with the probe, one sentenced, one due to be tried in two different courts in July and October, and at least three dozen more sealed indictments filed in D.C. District court waiting until the time is right to unseal them. We also still don't know anything about what was found when the FBI raided the GOP fund raising outfit in Maryland last May, looking for evidence of money laundering.

I'd say we have a while to go, yet. Have patience.

Last edited by cuebald; 04-05-2018 at 09:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,732,040 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valhallian View Post
The fact that even Gowdy has come out multiple times defending the investigation says something
True. I wonder how this gets explained away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
7,826 posts, read 2,729,107 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
True. I wonder how this gets explained away.
Key prominent Republicans (the last few grownups) support Mueller. I mean they and Mueller are all Republicans for crying out loud. This investigation is looking into how and why Russia interfered in a federal election...this is something we as a country need to know. If the Trump team finds itself smack in the middle of the Russians during the course of the investigation that's not really Mueller's fault. The talking points on the right are beyond absurd to the point I no longer really feel the need to respond. If this was really an actual "witch hunt" those same prominent Republicans would be crying bloody murder and they aren't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 11:34 AM
 
3,306 posts, read 1,347,359 times
Reputation: 2730
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
And designed to irritate---not illuminate...
“Designed” is too generous a word. It suggests forethought.

If he doesn’t want to talk about Manafort’s failures and Downing’s disastrous day in court, he shouldn’t have started a thread about it.

Last edited by hellopity; 04-05-2018 at 11:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 11:43 AM
 
7,447 posts, read 2,834,440 times
Reputation: 4922
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellopity View Post
If he doesn’t want to talk about Manafort’s failures and Downing’s disastrous day in court, he shouldn’t have started a thread about it.

For him to think of that he would need the forethought you already mentioned he lacks. Quite a pickle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 11:53 AM
 
3,306 posts, read 1,347,359 times
Reputation: 2730
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax View Post
For him to think of that he would need the forethought you already mentioned he lacks. Quite a pickle.
True enough. To return to Manafort and his ties...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...aine-president

“Emails seen by the Guardian show a regular pattern of interaction between Manafort, Friedman, Gates, Kilimnik and Ukrainian officials. Gates, who went on to work with Manafort on the 2016 Trump campaign, wrote several messages. In February Gates admitted conspiracy and lying to the FBI, and agreed to cooperate with Mueller.

At the time Kilimnik was the Russian manager of Manafort’s Kiev office. Kilminik is understood to be “Person A” in Mueller’s latest indictment, filed last week. It says the FBI believes Kilimnik has ties to Moscow’s GRU spy agency, and adds that Gates was aware of this.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2018, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,222 posts, read 19,210,527 times
Reputation: 14914
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellopity View Post
True enough. To return to Manafort and his ties...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...aine-president

“Emails seen by the Guardian show a regular pattern of interaction between Manafort, Friedman, Gates, Kilimnik and Ukrainian officials. Gates, who went on to work with Manafort on the 2016 Trump campaign, wrote several messages. In February Gates admitted conspiracy and lying to the FBI, and agreed to cooperate with Mueller.

At the time Kilimnik was the Russian manager of Manafort’s Kiev office. Kilminik is understood to be “Person A” in Mueller’s latest indictment, filed last week. It says the FBI believes Kilimnik has ties to Moscow’s GRU spy agency, and adds that Gates was aware of this.”
Kilimnik worked with Yanukovych, who stole $32 Billion when he left the Ukraine for Russia. He was also the go-between for Manafort and Deripaska. Manafort ran Yanukovych's campaign, came back to the states in October of 2015, and went to work for the Trump campaign four months later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top