Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,233 posts, read 3,617,392 times
Reputation: 8965

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
I know what sarcasm is and this is why I believe that line was meant to be sarcastic. It employs irony and is the opposite of what Roseanne actually believes.
Based on what? What visual or other cues are given to show she believes the opposite of what she's saying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:49 AM
 
28,163 posts, read 25,338,432 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaphawoman View Post
Based on what? What visual or other cues are given to show she believes the opposite of what she's saying?
Based on the fact that there would be no other logical reason for this joke. And yes, it was meant as a joke considering the laugh track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,233 posts, read 3,617,392 times
Reputation: 8965
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Then this wouldn't be a joke.

Jokes have a humorous twist, a juxtaposition of the incongruent that elicits laughter.

"They're just like us" when they all agree "They're just like us," is not a joke.

It is a comment "totally congruent with who they are as people."
I just explained it to you. The joke is that Dan is worrying over nothing and they fall back to sleep. But there IS juxtaposition: Dan's worry vs. Roseanne's total non-chalance. This contrast of reactions is used in comedy all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,233 posts, read 3,617,392 times
Reputation: 8965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Based on the fact that there would be no other logical reason for this joke. And yes, it was meant as a joke considering the laugh track.
It is a joke, but it's not an I'm-saying-the-opposite-of-what-I-mean joke. There are NO indicators of that at all. They would have to say something or show us something to indicate that and they don't. In fact, there is a 20-year history of the character traits of the family SUPPORTING her belief that they're just like us. I'm really starting to believe you're either not a native English speaker or you haven't watched much comedy before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:56 AM
 
51,656 posts, read 25,878,242 times
Reputation: 37897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaphawoman View Post
I just explained it to you. The joke is that Dan is worrying over nothing and they fall back to sleep. But there IS juxtaposition: Dan's worry vs. Roseanne's total non-chalance.
Roseanne reassuring Dan he has nothing to worry about is not a joke.

Maybe start by looking up the definition of juxtaposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 06:59 AM
 
51,656 posts, read 25,878,242 times
Reputation: 37897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaphawoman View Post
It is a joke, but it's not an I'm-saying-the-opposite-of-what-I-mean joke. There are NO indicators of that at all. They would have to say something or show us something to indicate that and they don't. In fact, there is a 20-year history of the character traits of the family SUPPORTING her belief that they're just like us. I'm really starting to believe you're either not a native English speaker or you haven't watched much comedy before.
And I'm starting to believe you are blowing smoke here.

Accusing others of not watching enough comedy or not being a native English speaker is not helping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,233 posts, read 3,617,392 times
Reputation: 8965
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Roseanne reassuring Dan he has nothing to worry about is not a joke.

Maybe start by looking up the definition of juxtaposition.
I didn't say that--I said their contrasting reactions was the joke, and you're the one that brought up juxtapositions. I don't need to look up definitions--I've written for TV in comedy, have read many screenplays, and have also worked for a market research company during pilot season where we actually tracked the points in time when test audiences laugh. But you don't have to be a professional to recognize the 'opposite reactions' as a comedy staple. If Roseanne agreed with Dan and was like "Oh we better catch up on the DVR" instead of blowing him off and falling back to sleep there's no joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Brackenwood
10,000 posts, read 5,706,423 times
Reputation: 22160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
Based on the fact that there would be no other logical reason for this joke. And yes, it was meant as a joke considering the laugh track.
Let me state the obvious that nobody else seems to have touched on yet: The primary target of the joke wasn't blacks or Asians, or flyover attitudes about blacks or Asians... but the shows themselves, which deal with the subject matter of minorities trying to figure out how to adapt to the broader society while preserving their own cultural roots.

There, now do you get it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:22 AM
 
51,656 posts, read 25,878,242 times
Reputation: 37897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaphawoman View Post
I didn't say that--I said their contrasting reactions was the joke, and you're the one that brought up juxtapositions. I don't need to look up definitions--I've written for TV in comedy, have read many screenplays, and have also worked for a market research company during pilot season where we actually tracked the points in time when test audiences laugh. But you don't have to be a professional to recognize the 'opposite reactions' as a comedy staple. If Roseanne agreed with Dan and was like "Oh we better catch up on the DVR" instead of blowing him off and falling back to sleep there's no joke.
Can we safely assume that you are no longer writing for TV comedies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2018, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Virginia
6,233 posts, read 3,617,392 times
Reputation: 8965
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Can we safely assume that you are no longer writing for TV comedies?
Can we safely assume that you have never seen a TV comedy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top