Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-11-2018, 07:53 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
Trump is not above the law. Remember Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon?
The Military was going to do it with, or without Trump. Ask Rodgers, Mattis & Kelley, who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:06 AM
 
5,938 posts, read 4,698,667 times
Reputation: 4631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
Trump is not above the law. Remember Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon?
The law is only as good as its enforcement. Nixon lost the support of his Republican colleagues in the Senate. He no longer had the support of the 34 Senators necessary to prevent conviction in an impeachment trial.

Consider all the stuff Trump is doing and how we get a lot of lip service from his colleagues condemning it but they still ultimately support him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:08 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
While I hope you are wrong, unfortunately, from some of the lunacy we have seen in the past year or so, you could absolutely be correct. Trump is a loose cannon, and unstable as Hell. He also feels invincible, so he might just take that leap.

Right now, he is weighing his options. If he allows Mueller to finish the job, he knows a lot of very damaging information about him will be brought out. If he fires Mueller, he will take some heat, but maybe not as bad as what he would get if Mueller indicts him or he is considered for impeachment.

With as crazy as this whole ordeal is, I would not bet either way. When you are dealing with an unpredictable , mentally unstable individual, you never know what they will do.
You don't think that Trump getting rid of Mueller by any strategy is going to be a Constitutional crisis of epic proportion?
I think it will be the fastest lawsuit to get to the Supreme Court since Bush v Gore---
And I wouldn't count on Trump winning

The Supreme Court has not been too supportive of Trump's moves on ICE legislation

I think even with the new guy on the Court which Trump appointed there is good chance that the Supremes still respect the rule of law and want to maintain a balance of power between the DoJ and the WH

Just remember that the DoJ work for the PEOPLE of the US--not to protect Trump from being investigated

Clinton went through his own laborious investigation w/o trying to fire Ken Starr
Nixon tried to get rid of his investigation and it blew up in his face

I know Trump doesn't pay attention to history much but the one thing he apparently was interested in when he met with Henry Kissinger during the transition period (when we thought he was picking his brains about foreign policy/Russia/China) was the Nixon/Watergate debacle...
So even then Trump likely could see the Russia hacking story was going to be big problem for him...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:10 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Stepping on a sitting President's 4th and 5th amendment rights, with council?
Only the KGB & Gestapo were this blatant.
Keep spinning...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:16 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by dspguy View Post
The law is only as good as its enforcement. Nixon lost the support of his Republican colleagues in the Senate. He no longer had the support of the 34 Senators necessary to prevent conviction in an impeachment trial.

Consider all the stuff Trump is doing and how we get a lot of lip service from his colleagues condemning it but they still ultimately support him.
Kennedy and Graham both came out and said "don't do it"
Of course that is likely a red flag to Trump

I imagine Dershowitz was very persuasive but Trump always likes to hear what he wants to hear
His "legal advisor" is Judge Janine most of the time

And if Dershowitz WAS so firmly in Trump's camp why hasn't he joined that law team
Because he knows Trump is a lousy payer and he doesn't have case law to support firing Mueller

Clinton took the heat for the Starr investigation
Nixon tried to fire his independent counsel and it totally backfired--
Everyone knew he was guilty as soon as that happened...
It just took time to play out

By trying to fire Mueller/Rosenstein/Sessions Trump further dives into the black hole of obstruction of justice

He has never had to deal with a situation he could not bully or "negotiate" his way out of...
And he certainly doesn't like to hear advice that goes against his own desires...
The ability to take constructive criticism is just not in a narcissist's wheelhouse...

His "base" might support that move but I think more Republican voters would see it as proof that there is guilt amidst all the smoke...
It will not help at the mid-terms...
Why do you think Ryan won't run for re-election?
He knows the future is not promising...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:20 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The Military was going to do it with, or without Trump. Ask Rodgers, Mattis & Kelley, who swore to defend and uphold the Constitution.
What does that mean--
Any move by the military into domestic political policy is a Constitutional violation---
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,169 posts, read 19,194,865 times
Reputation: 14896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
It would end the scam. The FBI is now running roughshod in every area of Trump's life. That is enough to stop it. It is an abomination to our country, our elected president and every voter who put Trump in office. It is a scam on this country and every voter. We know full well it is a charade produced to create negative taking points. I am not fooled. No Russian collusion and Mueller is dirty. His ties to the Bush family speaks volumns.
If Mueller is fired, the investigation will not miss a beat. He has sixteen of the most talented attorneys in the country on his team, and I'm sure he has set it up so that it will continue without him. I am also pretty certain that if the whole investigation is shut down, he has shared enough evidence with state AGs and DAs that state charges will follow as soon as the lights in Mueller's office are turned off.

Unless Trump thinks he can fire and disband the entire Judicial Branch of the Federal Government, he is an abject fool to believe that firing Mueller is anything more than bringing coals to Newcastle.

The FBI, by the way, is operating by the book. Had Trump also done that, like Obama did, there would never have been a Special Prosecutor appointed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:25 AM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,862,293 times
Reputation: 25341
There would have been a special prosecutor because the GOP in House and Senate didn't want to know what was going on inside Trump's campaign that might have been tied to Russian efforts to impede/sway the US election...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:29 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
The people that voted for Trump and the people he has gained since the emotional and unstable Democrat spectical that has been performed, Trump could fire Mueller and still be re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2018, 08:32 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
What does that mean--
Any move by the military into domestic political policy is a Constitutional violation---
What was going to stop them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top