Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, if you want to trust legal advice from a radical left wing pundit who laughingly passes herself (himself?) as some kind of journalist..then sure, knock yourself out. Remember, this is the same liberal troll who freaked out when Trump didn't turn around and wave to the press before boarding AF1...
LOL, exactly.
Rachael Maddow belongs on The View - not on serious TV or media.
1. Do you think the President will be impeached? No, not by this House and Senate.
2. Do you think the President will be indicted? The Supreme Court will decide this -No
3. In either case, what happens then? More of the same.
4. Will the President fire Mueller? He can't do that, and he'll have to replace Rosenstein with a person who has a serious death with to do so
In order for trump (or any President) to be indicted or impeached, there must be irrefutable evidence of indictable or impeachable action(s) directly attributed to the person. So far, no such evidence has been shown.
I don't remember how long this "investigation" has been going on, but it has been a long time. If Mueller and his cohorts have not found anything by now, I really doubt they ever will. IMO, this "investigation" has become a classic example of an "Exercise In Futility" and "Featherbedding". Mueller and his cronies have a great, high paying, publicity-laden gig, and they aren't about to let it go!
In order for trump (or any President) to be indicted or impeached, there must be irrefutable evidence of indictable or impeachable action(s) directly attributed to the person. So far, no such evidence has been shown.
I don't remember how long this "investigation" has been going on, but it has been a long time. If Mueller and his cohorts have not found anything by now, I really doubt they ever will. IMO, this "investigation" has become a classic example of an "Exercise In Futility" and "Featherbedding". Mueller and his cronies have a great, high paying, publicity-laden gig, and they aren't about to let it go!
Yes, first, they had irrefutable evidence of an impeachable offense against Bill Clinton, but still didn't remove him.
Second, if Mueller had anything on Trump, he wouldn't have tried for months to get Trump to agree to come in for a perjury trap. Also, Mueller wouldn't have gone full retard, and sunk to a new low of going after the Presents's lawyer if he had anything.
Couple that with the fact that the media have resorted to flooding the news cycle with completely unsubstantiated claims, all in a desperate attempt to keep the Trump investigation alive.
Every indication is that Mueller has nothing on Trump.
My guess is that Trump will be impeached after Democrats take the House in 2018 but not removed from office because the Democrats won’t have the needed votes in the Senate even if they do manage to get a majority (unlikely). He will then be indicted because his crimes are obvious to anyone who still cares about facts. He’ll pardon himself and probably win re-election by a slim margin (probably losing the popular vote again) in 2020.
My guess is that Trump will be impeached after Democrats take the House in 2018 but not removed from office because the Democrats won’t have the needed votes in the Senate even if they do manage to get a majority (unlikely). He will then be indicted because his crimes are obvious to anyone who still cares about facts. He’ll pardon himself and probably win re-election by a slim margin (probably losing the popular vote again) in 2020.
The problem with your assessment is, the facts are that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing by Trump.
Yes, first, they had irrefutable evidence of an impeachable offense against Bill Clinton, but still didn't remove him.
Second, if Mueller had anything on Trump, he wouldn't have tried for months to get Trump to agree to come in for a perjury trap. Also, Mueller wouldn't have gone full retard, and sunk to a new low of going after the Presents's lawyer if he had anything.
Couple that with the fact that the media have resorted to flooding the news cycle with completely unsubstantiated claims, all in a desperate attempt to keep the Trump investigation alive.
Every indication is that Mueller has nothing on Trump.
Lmao at trump supporters: there is no such thing as perjury trap. If you lie against factual statements you're a liar period. Just like Gates, Flynn, and bunch of other trump criminals. Same thing will happen to erik prince and cohen.
The obstruction of justice case is strongest in the history of the United States of America.
Trump ppl think that mueller had to have interview to nail trump, lmao. He doesnt need it that's why the report will easily proceed with multiple counts of obstruction of justice anyways. Of course it's a nice to have to interview the subject of the investigation, but they have him grilled already.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
