Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To all of you anti-Trump people. Please three reasons: Like A: B: C: Why you feel that a proper investigation shouldn't be opened on the handling of the Clinton email probe? Please don't rant on for paragraphs. Just a simple sentence or thought.
To all of you anti-Trump people. Please three reasons: Like A: B: C: Why you feel that a proper investigation shouldn't be opened on the handling of the Clinton email probe? Please don't rant on for paragraphs. Just a simple sentence or thought.
Hillary has been investigated quite a few times over the past 5-8 years or so.
If there were enough evidence to warrant an investigation into Hillary and all the other people that were proposed yesterday by those 11 GOP members, there would already be one.
Hillary has been investigated quite a few times over the past 5-8 years or so.
If there were enough evidence to warrant an investigation into Hillary and all the other people that were proposed yesterday by those 11 GOP members, there would already be one.
But what if it wasn't able to get off the ground for the last few years because IT WASN'T ALLOWED TO ....because of bias, fear, politics?
To all of you anti-Trump people. Please three reasons: Like A: B: C: Why you feel that a proper investigation shouldn't be opened on the handling of the Clinton email probe? Please don't rant on for paragraphs. Just a simple sentence or thought.
You'd have to explain how a new investigation would be different from the previous ones. So far, the justification seems to be that because nothing indictable was found by previous investigations, the investigations were inadequate.
To all of you anti-Trump people. Please three reasons: Like A: B: C: Why you feel that a proper investigation shouldn't be opened on the handling of the Clinton email probe? Please don't rant on for paragraphs. Just a simple sentence or thought.
There's NO reason to not proceed. If she's done some dirt, then she should pay the price.
After all, your boy tRump promised he'd take care of it. And he owns the DOJ.
But what if it wasn't able to get off the ground for the last few years because IT WASN'T ALLOWED TO ....because of bias, fear, politics?
OK. Exactly how were these investigations blocked? What stones were left unturned? "Because they must have been, otherwise they would have found something indictable" is a wholly inadequate answer.
But what if it wasn't able to get off the ground for the last few years because IT WASN'T ALLOWED TO ....because of bias, fear, politics?
Look at who was running the DoJ and FBI. Even Comey said because she was the presumptive heir to the throne, they were essentially trying to protect her. I think Strzok and Page in a text said something to the effect they didn't want to make her mad because she was a b1 tch.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
